2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling responses of cotton growth and yield to pre-planting soil moisture with the CROPGRO-Cotton model for a mulched drip irrigation system in the Tarim Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the research, the simulated errors of the calibrated WOFOST for emergence, flowering, and maturity were +1 days, +2 days, and +1 days, respectively, showing good simulation accuracy (2.74% error). Existing studies have shown that the average error of phenological development time simulated by calibrated CROPGRO-Cotton in southern Xinjiang is 2.52% [48], which is close to the simulation accuracy of this study. Other research results show that calibrated CROPGRO-Cotton fairly predicts phenological events such as anthesis and physiological maturity with RMSE of ≤2.27 and ≤4.98 d, respectively, in northwestern India [49], and absolute relative errors of 1.7%, 1.1%, and 1.1% based on modified CROPGRO-Cotton.…”
Section: Simulation Performance Analysis Of the Calibrated Wofost Mod...supporting
confidence: 88%
“…In the research, the simulated errors of the calibrated WOFOST for emergence, flowering, and maturity were +1 days, +2 days, and +1 days, respectively, showing good simulation accuracy (2.74% error). Existing studies have shown that the average error of phenological development time simulated by calibrated CROPGRO-Cotton in southern Xinjiang is 2.52% [48], which is close to the simulation accuracy of this study. Other research results show that calibrated CROPGRO-Cotton fairly predicts phenological events such as anthesis and physiological maturity with RMSE of ≤2.27 and ≤4.98 d, respectively, in northwestern India [49], and absolute relative errors of 1.7%, 1.1%, and 1.1% based on modified CROPGRO-Cotton.…”
Section: Simulation Performance Analysis Of the Calibrated Wofost Mod...supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Os procedimentos gerais de calibração e definição dos parâmetros de entrada do modelo são semelhantes entre estudos com o CROPGRO, que começa com os coeficientes iniciais que são extraídos do arquivo de genótipo do DSSAT e seleciona o melhor valor para cada coeficiente avaliando o erro quadrático médio (RMSE) entre as variáveis simuladas e observadas (Alderman et al, 2015;BAO et al, 2015;Bosi et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020)…”
Section: Modelo Crop Simulation Model -Cropgrounclassified
“…Geralmente, a produtividade de biomassa e a cobertura do dossel são os principais fatores de comparações. Os valores simulados e observados são submetidos a análises estatísticas, afim de evidenciar a precisão e confiança do modelo (Bosi et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Xrftunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…M. Li et al (2018) and X. Wang et al (2020) used the experimentally determined soil evaporation reduction coefficient under film mulching conditions to reflect the effect of mulching on soil evaporation in the DSSAT model simulation. In fact, film mulching will reduce the potential evaporation capacity of the soil and further reduce the actual evaporation of the soil; meanwhile, the determination of the film mulching evaporation coefficient is empirical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%