2005
DOI: 10.4054/demres.2005.13.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling regional variation of first-time births in Denmark 1980-1994 by an age-period-cohort model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) (SAS Institute Inc., 1999). As pointed out by Thygesen et al (2005) when fitting models to data of a very large size which is the case here, almost any effect will be statistically significant. This, however, does not necessarily mean that the effect is substantively important.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…(2) (SAS Institute Inc., 1999). As pointed out by Thygesen et al (2005) when fitting models to data of a very large size which is the case here, almost any effect will be statistically significant. This, however, does not necessarily mean that the effect is substantively important.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For a long time, spatial fertility variation was an under-researched topic in the literature on low fertility in industrialised countries. However, recent contributions to the literature are evidence of the growing interest in spatial aspects of fertility, including urban-rural fertility differences (HANK 2001;THYGESEN et al 2005;DE BEER and DEERENBERG 2007;. Studies show that urban-rural fertility variation has decreased over time, but significant differences between various settlements persist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban fertility, including both marital and overall, was lower than rural fertility during the last part of the first demographic transition, decreasing more rapidly with the second transition (Sharlin, 1986;). An increasing attention to spatial features of fertility levels emerged in recent literature (Hank 2001;Thygesen et al, 2005;De Beer & Deerenberg, 2007;, since urban-rural fertility variations may have decreased over time, but significant differences among various types of settlement still persist nowadays (Kulu, Vikat, & Andersson, 2007;Kulu, 2011). Fertility levels were higher in rural areas or small towns and lower in large cities, e.g.…”
Section: Suburban Fertility In Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fertility levels were higher in rural areas or small towns and lower in large cities, e.g. in the United States (Glusker et al, 2000), Eastern Europe (Burcin & Kučera, 2000;Vobecká & Piguet, 2012;Vojtěchovská, 2000;Kulu, 2005;Philipov & Kohler, 2001), Northern Europe Thygesen, Knudsen & Keiding, 2005), England and Wales (Boyle et al, 2007;Tromans, Natamba & Jefferies, 2009), the Netherlands (De Beer & Deerenberg, 2007;Mulder & Wagner, 2001), Italy (Michielin, 2004;Vitali & Billari, 2011), as well as, in Germany and Austria (Hank, 2001;Kulu, 2006). Suburban fertility in contemporary Europe has started to increase since the 1950s-1960s, following the post-war baby boom and growing suburbanization ).…”
Section: Suburban Fertility In Europementioning
confidence: 99%