2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1471-4051(01)00003-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling port/ferry choice in RoRo freight transportation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are also some distinctions between port choice of captive and contestable hinterlands. For instance, port location was found the second least important consturct in our paper, on the other hand port location is an important determinant of other port selection studies [38,39,40,41,42]. This distinction is not surprising because the distance between origin of cargo and different ports in contestable hinterlands is almost equal in terms of time and/or cost.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…However, there are also some distinctions between port choice of captive and contestable hinterlands. For instance, port location was found the second least important consturct in our paper, on the other hand port location is an important determinant of other port selection studies [38,39,40,41,42]. This distinction is not surprising because the distance between origin of cargo and different ports in contestable hinterlands is almost equal in terms of time and/or cost.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…The attributes with high importance and high performance gap are called "salient factors" by Brooks et al (2010). Mangan et al (2002) identify the "salient factors" for port/ferry choice in roll-on-roll-off freight transportation, and position these factors into the importance-performance difference model illustrated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Ipa With Gap Between Focal Performance and Competitors' Perfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source: adapted from Martilla and James (1977), Mangan et al(2002), Deng et al( 2008) Figure 2 IPA with Gap 2 analysis (performance difference between focal and competitors) Matzler et al (2003), Deng et al (2008), Lin et al (2009) …”
Section: Low Importance Highmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations