2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of the response of an ACFM sensor to rail and rail wheel RCF cracks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pulsed eddy current (PEC) probes perform far better than Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) to detect the rail defect but with lift-off variation problem [5]. Alternating Current Field Measurement (ACFM) have a good potential for RCF with maximum operating lift-off, but it is not sensitive for sub-surface defect, and it is also difficult to identify multi-cracks [6]. Electromagnetic acoustic transducers (EMATs) can generate the surface wave to detect RCF in rail at a small standoff distance, which is a non-contact technique with high speed potentiality yet with lift-off limitation [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulsed eddy current (PEC) probes perform far better than Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) to detect the rail defect but with lift-off variation problem [5]. Alternating Current Field Measurement (ACFM) have a good potential for RCF with maximum operating lift-off, but it is not sensitive for sub-surface defect, and it is also difficult to identify multi-cracks [6]. Electromagnetic acoustic transducers (EMATs) can generate the surface wave to detect RCF in rail at a small standoff distance, which is a non-contact technique with high speed potentiality yet with lift-off limitation [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows the Bx and Bz responses to the perpendicular cracks in the weld. There is a dip in Bx and a peak and a trough in Bz, but considering the background value, the normalized Bx [12] is 0.005, which means a much lower sensitivity to perpendicular cracks in ACFM inspection.…”
Section: Simulation Model Set-up and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters for characterizing the inspection sensitivity, S X and S Z , are given as follows to reduce detection error and improve the SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) 14) .…”
Section: Crack Detection Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%