Abstract:Furthermore it is demonstrated that the number of calcination carbonation cycles changes the sulphation patterns of the CaO from heterogeneous to homogeneous in all the limestones tested. For 50 carbonation calcination cycles and for particle sizes below 200 µm, the sulphation pattern is in all cases homogeneous. The sulphation rates were found to be first order with respect to SO 2 , and zero with respect to CO 2 . Steam was observed to have a positive effect only in the diffusion through the product layer co… Show more
“…Because the molar volume of CaSO 4 is much larger than that of CaO, the sulfation reaction results in pore blockage along with the product layer development. , Thus, the porous structure parameters are often taken into consideration while analyzing product layer development. − Most previous studies examining the product layer focused on the effect of product layer development on the sulfation reaction rather than attrition. Cordero and Alonso reported that the critical product layer thickness corresponding to the kinetic control regime and diffusion control regime changing for limestone sulfation reactions is in the range of 13–43 nm for different types of limestone under varying temperature conditions . Similarly, the reaction of CaO with CO 2 also involves the development of the product layer and the regime change from kinetic control to diffusion control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Many of the attrition studies under fluidized bed conditions, including the present research, are conducted with an attrition time shorter than a few hours, which is much less than that in the study conducted by Xiao et al Therefore, the change in the appearance of the particle as a result of protuberance removal is limited. Meanwhile, the product layer is found to increase continuously as the conversion degree increases . Thus, the attrition rate decrease is thought to be the consequence of the formation of a calcium sulfate product layer, which is harder than calcium oxide. − The product layer thickness increases as the conversion degree of sulfation increases, while the attrition rate decreases.…”
Limestone is widely
used as a sorbent in fluidized bed combustors.
The study of limestone attrition characteristics is significant for
mass balance and desulfurization efficiency. The present study investigates
the sulfation and attrition behavior of limestone in a bubbling fluidized
bed reactor. The product distribution and development of the product
layer are analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. The experimental
results show the attrition rate dropped dramatically at the initial
kinetic-controlled regime of the sulfation reaction. The observations
show that the distribution of the product is not uniform but primarily
concentrated on the external surface of the particle. Meanwhile, the
thickness of the product layer at the initial stage of the sulfation
reaction reaches 0.7 μm, which is larger than that predicted
by previous investigators, and it results in a dramatic decrease in
the attrition rate. As sulfation continues, the thickness of the product
layer increases and reaches 1.6 μm at the diffusion-controlled
regime of the reaction, whereas the attrition rate decays to a steady
state. A random pore model is also used to analyze the development
of the product layer thickness by counting in the whole reaction surface,
but the results show a much smaller value as a result of the lack
of consideration of the unreacted core, which verifies the early pore
blockage in the initial stage observed in the present study.
“…Because the molar volume of CaSO 4 is much larger than that of CaO, the sulfation reaction results in pore blockage along with the product layer development. , Thus, the porous structure parameters are often taken into consideration while analyzing product layer development. − Most previous studies examining the product layer focused on the effect of product layer development on the sulfation reaction rather than attrition. Cordero and Alonso reported that the critical product layer thickness corresponding to the kinetic control regime and diffusion control regime changing for limestone sulfation reactions is in the range of 13–43 nm for different types of limestone under varying temperature conditions . Similarly, the reaction of CaO with CO 2 also involves the development of the product layer and the regime change from kinetic control to diffusion control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Many of the attrition studies under fluidized bed conditions, including the present research, are conducted with an attrition time shorter than a few hours, which is much less than that in the study conducted by Xiao et al Therefore, the change in the appearance of the particle as a result of protuberance removal is limited. Meanwhile, the product layer is found to increase continuously as the conversion degree increases . Thus, the attrition rate decrease is thought to be the consequence of the formation of a calcium sulfate product layer, which is harder than calcium oxide. − The product layer thickness increases as the conversion degree of sulfation increases, while the attrition rate decreases.…”
Limestone is widely
used as a sorbent in fluidized bed combustors.
The study of limestone attrition characteristics is significant for
mass balance and desulfurization efficiency. The present study investigates
the sulfation and attrition behavior of limestone in a bubbling fluidized
bed reactor. The product distribution and development of the product
layer are analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. The experimental
results show the attrition rate dropped dramatically at the initial
kinetic-controlled regime of the sulfation reaction. The observations
show that the distribution of the product is not uniform but primarily
concentrated on the external surface of the particle. Meanwhile, the
thickness of the product layer at the initial stage of the sulfation
reaction reaches 0.7 μm, which is larger than that predicted
by previous investigators, and it results in a dramatic decrease in
the attrition rate. As sulfation continues, the thickness of the product
layer increases and reaches 1.6 μm at the diffusion-controlled
regime of the reaction, whereas the attrition rate decays to a steady
state. A random pore model is also used to analyze the development
of the product layer thickness by counting in the whole reaction surface,
but the results show a much smaller value as a result of the lack
of consideration of the unreacted core, which verifies the early pore
blockage in the initial stage observed in the present study.
“…One typical limestone from Shandong Province (denoted as “L”) was chosen as the sorbent precursor for CO 2 capture in the work. It was first milled and sieved by filter screens to get a uniform particle size of <0.2 mm, which was prove to be an efficient size range for CO 2 capture in the literature., , The material then was calcined at 900 °C for 2 h and mixed with coal ash or directly tested in CaL cycles. During calcination, the mass loss is measured to be 41.35%.…”
The
emerging calcium looping (CaL) process, basing on the reversible
reactions between CaO and CaCO3, is considered to be a
potential midterm mitigation solution in capturing CO2 from
coal-fired power plants. Normally, the efficient regeneration of sorbents
is realized through oxygen-enriched combustion of coal above 900 °C.
However, the minerals in coal will potentially affect the CO2 capture ability of sorbents and the effect could gradually intensify
as the temperature increases. Therefore, in this work, effects of
ash with a series of variables under a more practical oxy-fuel calcination
condition are evaluated, and the action mechanism of ash on the sorption
process is especially studied. Using a combination of testing approaches,
both physical and chemical contributions are observed and identified
for the effect of coal ash on the CO2 capturing of CaO-based
sorbents. The physical influence, caused by ash deposition and following
grain aggregation, on CaO-based sorbents for CO2 capture
is found to be inevitable and predominated. Meanwhile, it is also
suggested that solid–solid reactions involving Al and Si from
coal ash and Ca from sorbents will occur as the aggregation of coal
ash intensifies, which could negatively restrain the CO2 capture of CaO-based sorbents in the later stage of CaL. Furthermore,
both physical and chemical mechanisms are proposed in describing and
understanding the detailed interaction process between coal ash and
sorbents.
“…The conditions of realization of reaction (5) have been studied sufficiently. Specifically, the reaction is practically applied at temperature (T) 923-1123 K [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] and pressure (P) higher than 3 bar, 28,29 at mole fraction of CO 2 in N 2 (y CO 2 ) higher than 10% [27][28][29][30]33 and at a particle diameter of CaO (d p ) lower than 400 μm. 30,[32][33][34] It must be highlighted that the operating conditions of the reactor of the present work are: T = 550-850 K, y co2 < 10%, d p = 4 mm.…”
Section: The Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conditions of realization of reaction (5) have been studied sufficiently. Specifically, the reaction is practically applied at temperature (T) 923–1123 K and pressure (P) higher than 3 bar, at mole fraction of CO 2 in N 2 () higher than 10% and at a particle diameter of CaO (d p ) lower than 400 µm . It must be highlighted that the operating conditions of the reactor of the present work are: T = 550–850 K, y co2 < 10%, d p = 4 mm.The concentration of SO 2 in the pores of CaO particles is constant, due to the fact that there is no effect of gas diffusion in the particle pores.The rate of reaction (1) is defined from the combination of the intrinsic kinetic of reaction (3) and the diffusion of SO 2 in the product layer of CaSO 4 .…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.