2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2004.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of stress softening in elastomeric materials: foundations of simple theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To characterize stress-softening effects, there exist in the literature many different [20], Kazakevičiute-Makovska and Kačianauskas [21], and references cited therein for an overview of the main features of these models.…”
Section: A Nonmonotonous Stress-softening Materials Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize stress-softening effects, there exist in the literature many different [20], Kazakevičiute-Makovska and Kačianauskas [21], and references cited therein for an overview of the main features of these models.…”
Section: A Nonmonotonous Stress-softening Materials Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the accuracy of our proposed nonmonotonous model (43) to predict experimental data, we can conclude that the extent of damage of rubber-like materials, when subjected to small transverse vibrations, can be conveniently determined by considering the nonmonotonous behavior exhibited by experimental data. Furthermore, our proposed damage material mechanism model given by (14) can be applied to three-dimensional deformation states since the damage function is controlled by the strain energy associated with the primary deformation and not just by the specific deformation from which it is calculated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the primary loading path, is inactive, while on the unloading path, has the value given by (20). Substitution of (20) into (14) gives the following pseudo-elastic residual strain energy density per unit volume:…”
Section: Inclusion Of Residual Strain Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted further that the modified versions (13) and (15) of the original softening functions (12) and (14) cannot essentially improve predictions of pseudo-elastic models of the Mullins effect because the softening functions (13) and (15) are also monotonously increasing functions of the deformation extent m. On the other hand, the assumption thatĝðm; m m Þ should be a monotonously increasing function of m follows from the thermodynamical considerations. However, this conflict is only apparent and its source can easily be identified from the thermodynamical formulation of the Mullins effect presented by Kazakeviči ut_ e- Makovska and Kačianauskas (2004). The problem lies in the stress-strain relation (7) which gives the stress T in the softened material as the product of the elastic stress T 0 and the softening variable g = 1 À a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%