2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of heating and evaporation of gasoline fuel droplets: A comparative analysis of approximations

Abstract: Modelling of gasoline fuel droplet heating and evaporation processes is investigated using several approximations of this fuel. These are quasi-components used in the quasi-discrete model and the approximations of these quasi-components (Surrogate I (molar fractions: 83.0% n-C 6 H 14 + 15.6% n-C 10 H 22 + 1.4% n-C 14 H 30 ) and Surrogate II (molar fractions: 83.0% n-C 7 H 16 + 15.6% n-C 11 H 24 + 1.4% n-C 15 H 32 )). Also, we have used Surrogate A (molar fractions: 56% n-C 7 H 16 + 28% iso-C 8 H 18 + 17% C 7 H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As follows from this figure, the multi-component model predicts higher droplet surface temperatures and longer evaporation times compared with the single component model. This result is consistent with the one earlier reported in [15,16,17] for Diesel and gasoline fuel droplets. As in the case of the abovementioned fuels, this behaviour of the droplet surface temperature and radius can be related to the fact that at the final stages of droplet evaporation the mass fraction of species with larger numbers of carbon atoms n (C20:1 M, C18:1 M, C18:2 M, C18:0 M) increases at the expense of species with smaller n (C16:0 M) except at the very final stage of droplet evaporation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As follows from this figure, the multi-component model predicts higher droplet surface temperatures and longer evaporation times compared with the single component model. This result is consistent with the one earlier reported in [15,16,17] for Diesel and gasoline fuel droplets. As in the case of the abovementioned fuels, this behaviour of the droplet surface temperature and radius can be related to the fact that at the final stages of droplet evaporation the mass fraction of species with larger numbers of carbon atoms n (C20:1 M, C18:1 M, C18:2 M, C18:0 M) increases at the expense of species with smaller n (C16:0 M) except at the very final stage of droplet evaporation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…For modelling multi-component droplet heating and evaporation, with many species involved, a new model, called the quasi-discrete model was suggested and developed in [15,16,17]. This model is based on the introduction of quasi-components, describing groups of actual components with close properties.…”
Section: Species Diffusion In the Liquid Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, even if we restrict our analysis only to alkanes, it does not appear to be easy to approximate this distribution with a reasonably simple distribution function f m (n), given by Expression (1) (similar to the one used in [7,8,9]). Secondly, the contributions of the other five hydrocarbon groups apart from alkanes, presented in Table 2, cannot be ignored in any realistic model of Diesel fuels.…”
Section: Quasi-componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As demonstrated in our recent publications [7,8,9], the most important of the above-mentioned assumptions is that Diesel fuel can be approximated by a single component. The early models, taking into account the effect of multiple components in Diesel engines, could be subdivided into two main families: those based on the analysis of individual components (Discrete Component Models (DCM))(e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation