2019
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling multilocus selection in an individual‐based, spatially‐explicit landscape genetics framework

Abstract: We implemented multilocus selection in a spatially‐explicit, individual‐based framework that enables multivariate environmental gradients to drive selection in many loci as a new module for the landscape genetics programs, CDPOP and CDMetaPOP. Our module simulates multilocus selection using a linear additive model, providing a flexible platform to evaluate a wide range of genotype‐environment associations. Importantly, the module allows simulation of selection in any number of loci under the influence of any n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, however, our results strongly suggest that the adaptive differentiation of genes related to multiple metabolic pathways occurred in the genome of natural plant populations under multiple abiotic selection pressures. Our study gives us substantial insight into the genetic basis of the local adaptation of F. suspensa, which should form the foundation for more thorough confirmatory work in common garden experiments 9 and simulation modeling 50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Importantly, however, our results strongly suggest that the adaptive differentiation of genes related to multiple metabolic pathways occurred in the genome of natural plant populations under multiple abiotic selection pressures. Our study gives us substantial insight into the genetic basis of the local adaptation of F. suspensa, which should form the foundation for more thorough confirmatory work in common garden experiments 9 and simulation modeling 50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Given the difficulty of reliably isolating drivers and apportioning explanatory variance among them with either observational or common garden experiments on longlived tree species, we also recommend the use of simulation modeling (e.g., Landguth and Cushman, 2010;Landguth et al, 2017). Specifically, employing an individual-based, spatially explicit eco-evolutionary model (e.g., Landguth et al, 2020) to simulate the interactions of different degrees of gene flow, drift, environmental selection and phenotypic plasticity provides a unique means to explore the potential interactions of these factors and quantify the patterns of genomic and phenotypic variation that can be expected under these interactions (e.g., Cushman, 2015;Cushman and Landguth, 2016).…”
Section: Common Gardens Gradient Modeling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Memory needs and computation time increase with the number of loci simulated, because the numbers of possible unique gametes and genotypes increase geometrically with the number of loci and alleles per locus (Box 2), and increasing the number of classes entails a parallel increase in computation time. The comparison of computation times between MetaPopGen 2.0 and Nemo 2.2.0 suggests that, in order to simulate adaptive dynamics in small populations with more than a few loci, individual‐based simulators like Aladyn (Schiffers & Travis, 2014), Nemo and quantiNemo (Guillaume & Rougemont, 2006; Neuenschwander et al., 2008, 2019) or CDPOP and CDMetaPOP (Landguth et al., 2017, 2020; Landguth & Cushman, 2010) are still the best option. However, numerous species show phenotypic traits under the control of a few loci only (Courtier‐Orgogozo et al., 2020) and some of these traits are related to fitness and local adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%