2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.559697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Differences in Pinus strobiformis Across Latitudinal and Elevational Gradients

Abstract: Morphological Differences in Pinus strobiformis in seed source populations. However, we also note that given projected large range shift due to climate change, managers will have to balance the match between current ecotypic variation and expected range shift and changes in local adaptive optima under future climate conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Multiple) Linear regression is one of the simplest machine learning algorithms, often used for comparison purposes and creating parametric regression equations based on two (or more) parameters (Leal-Sáenz et al, 2020 ). A non-parametric Random Forest regression is based on constructing several decision trees at training time and outputting the average of the classes as the prediction of all individual trees (Breiman, 2001 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(Multiple) Linear regression is one of the simplest machine learning algorithms, often used for comparison purposes and creating parametric regression equations based on two (or more) parameters (Leal-Sáenz et al, 2020 ). A non-parametric Random Forest regression is based on constructing several decision trees at training time and outputting the average of the classes as the prediction of all individual trees (Breiman, 2001 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used Random Forests and Neural Networks because they have previously been applied in analysis of forest damages, and they have been found to perform better for events (especially in forestry) than other statistical methods (Hanewinkel, 2005 ; Guo et al, 2016 ). These seven algorithms were also successful to predict seed and cone traits of P. strobifomis by environmental variables (Leal-Sáenz et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We selected no-collinear environmental variables (|r| < 0.7) that were significantly correlated to the relative frequency (f r ) of outlier loci (C) for modelling six species-specific machine learning algorithms (MLM) of f r , all including cross-validation (CV). We used the following methods: (i) linear regression ("lm"), (ii) Random Forest ("rf"), (iii) Neural Network ("nnet"), iv) Model Averaged Neural Network ("avNNet"), (v) Multi-Layer Perceptron ("mlpWeightDecay") and (vi) Bayesian Regularized Neural Networks ("brnn") [64,65] (Available online: http://topepo.github.io/caret/index.html (accessed on December 2020)) in R (version 3.3.4) [63] (see more in [11]). Models were tested 15 through 10-fold crossvalidation, by using 80% of the dataset as a training set and the remaining 20% as a test set.…”
Section: Modelling Seed Zones From Environmentally-associated Aflp Variants and Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seed zones can be delineated: (i) by conducting provenance trials to detect associations between genetic, geographic and climatic factors [8][9][10]; (ii) by correlating climate and geomorphological data; and (iii) by using climate surrogates, such as latitude, longitude and/or elevation [5]; with the risk that such variables are not always good phenotype predictors for widespread tree species (e.g., [11]). Provenance trials are however timeconsuming and usually only allow measuring phenotypic differences between individuals and populations under common conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%