2011
DOI: 10.1201/b11559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling Morphological Response of Large Tidal Inlet Systems to Sea Level Rise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along the Dutch coast, the tidal waves propagate from southwest to northeast and have a semi-diurnal character with a mean tidal range of approximately 2 m. The average significant height is about 1 m (Cheung, Gerritsen, and Cleveringa 2007) with the dominant wave direction being from northwest. A combined effect of tidal and waveinduced currents causes a complex interaction leading to huge sediment influxes (Jirka and Uijttewaal 2004) and a net easterly sediment transport between the barrier islands/ inlets systems (Dissanayake 2011). The approximate Secchi depths observed in this region ranges between 0.00 and 3.50 m.…”
Section: The Ameland Inletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along the Dutch coast, the tidal waves propagate from southwest to northeast and have a semi-diurnal character with a mean tidal range of approximately 2 m. The average significant height is about 1 m (Cheung, Gerritsen, and Cleveringa 2007) with the dominant wave direction being from northwest. A combined effect of tidal and waveinduced currents causes a complex interaction leading to huge sediment influxes (Jirka and Uijttewaal 2004) and a net easterly sediment transport between the barrier islands/ inlets systems (Dissanayake 2011). The approximate Secchi depths observed in this region ranges between 0.00 and 3.50 m.…”
Section: The Ameland Inletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result confirms a previous sensitivity analysis performed with Delft3D [4], which showed that the factor for transverse bedload transport (which is analogous to the downslope parameter µ) controls the channel width to depth ratio. In Delft3D, channel widening could also be enhanced by increasing the dry-cell erosion factor [25]. This method is actually necessary in Delft3D to allow for widening of the inlet (Figure 9), whose banks cannot be eroded directly by bed shear stress (i.e., the term E).…”
Section: Morphodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the MORFAC approach, bed-level changes are multiplied by a morphological acceleration factor (MF) to enhance the morphological evolution. Extensive modeling studies for similar tidal systems show good results up to a MF of 400 (e.g., Braat et al, 2017;Dissanayake, 2011;Roelvink, 2006;van der Wegen & Roelvink, 2008), while wave action usually requires a lower MF.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The α bn is a very important parameter for the channel-shoal morphology and is often used as a calibration parameter, while model results are practically insensitive to α bs . In estuarine and tidal basin models, especially when using the Van Rijn transport formulations, the α bn is often set much (an order of magnitude) larger than the experimental and default values (1.5;Ikeda, 1982) to prevent the formation of unrealistically steep banks, and narrow deep channels with sharp bends (e.g., Dissanayake, 2011;van der Wegen & Roelvink, 2012).…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%