“…However, comparisons with these early models showed, that only with sophisticated 3D-models and a realistic bathymetry sensible results can be expected (Thoma et al, 2007a). Successive studies, applying the most reasonable boundary conditions, have investigated the circulation, the mass balance at the ice-lake interface, the tracer dispersion within the lake, and the amount of accreted ice at the icelake interface for Lake Vostok (Thoma et al, 2007a(Thoma et al, ,b, 2008aFilina et al, 2008), but no adequate information (e.g., water depth, ice thickness, grounding line, heat fluxes) was available about any other subglacial lake until now. In this study we turn towards Lake Concordia which is located near Dome C at 74.0 • S and 125.2 • E (see inlet in Figure 1a) and many times smaller than Lake Vostok.…”