1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1923(99)00033-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling leaf gas exchange in holm-oak trees in southern Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, integrating θ variation in BA site in the first 3 m depth and at 13.3 m of distance -the half of mean distance among trees with 18 trees ha −1 -, the transpiration rate estimated for the summer period was 7 265 L ha with 34% canopy cover versus 18 trees ha −1 and 21% in BA site) [16,17]. Hence, although θ varied little during summer, the huge volume of soil explored by Q. ilex root system [29], allows trees to uptake a high volume of water, 19.3, 43.3 and 37.4% from the first, second and third meter depth, respectively.…”
Section: Deep Water Consumption By Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, integrating θ variation in BA site in the first 3 m depth and at 13.3 m of distance -the half of mean distance among trees with 18 trees ha −1 -, the transpiration rate estimated for the summer period was 7 265 L ha with 34% canopy cover versus 18 trees ha −1 and 21% in BA site) [16,17]. Hence, although θ varied little during summer, the huge volume of soil explored by Q. ilex root system [29], allows trees to uptake a high volume of water, 19.3, 43.3 and 37.4% from the first, second and third meter depth, respectively.…”
Section: Deep Water Consumption By Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spacing of trees in dehesas is advantageous in terms of water potential and CO 2 assimilation rates at leaf and tree scale along the summer [16,28], compared to other holm-oak forest systems [39,40]. Joffre et al [22] pointed out that the dehesa structure follows an ecohydrological equilibrium sensu Eagleson [8], who hypothesised that water limits natural vegetation systems, providing a canopy density that produces both minimum water stress and maximum biomass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When soil or atmospheric water is insufficient, leaf stomatal conductance reduces and correspondingly CO 2 fixation is limited (Dang et al, 1997;Hogg et al, 2000;Grant et al, 2006a). Extensive studies have demonstrated the influence of SWC on C fixation at leaf (Infante et al, 1999;Lawlor, 1995) and canopy (Reichstein et al, 2002;Rambal et al, 2003) levels. For three Mediterranean evergreen forests, drought caused lightsaturated ecosystem gross C fixation and day-time averaged canopy conductance to decline by up to 90% and ecosystem water-use efficiency relative to the gross C fixation to decrease (Reichstein et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algunos autores han obtenido valores próximos o superiores a 3 m 2 m -2 , pero en masas densas de encina (Bussotti et al, 2002;Hoff et al, 2002). Sin embargo, en trabajos realizados en dehesas de encina los valores son muy próximos a los observados en este trabajo, así Infante et al, (1999) obtuvieron valores entre 1,6 y 2,5 m 2 m -2 , en formaciones de densidad parecida a las de este trabajo. El bajo valor de LAI obtenido pudo estar influenciado por el mal estado del arbolado, ya que la parcela presenta síntomas de decaimiento, con defoliaciones parciales y fenómenos de puntisecado, muy frecuentes en la dehesas de Andalucía (Navarro Cerrillo et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified