Modelling dynamics of knowledge networks and local connectedness: a case study of urban high-tech companies in The Netherlands

Abstract

There are increasing doubts on the importance of localized knowledge and learning as benefits from a clustered location. Some empirical studies indicate that the influence of local proximity in knowledge networks stretches over larger distances than in previous times, while others suggest that local and global knowledge networks coexist. This study seeks to fill a gap in understanding how knowledge networks are shaped and how global networks may affect strength of local connectedness in a cluster. The study adopts an entrepreneurial view, drawing on a selected sample of urban innovators in the Netherlands, and employs rough set analysis and various other learning experiments. The results suggest that local/regional and global networks coexist in the urban places; this as a result of the interplay of spatial focus in the overall strategy, network capabilities and innovation intensity. With regard to local connectedness, our tentative results indicate a limited, but differentiated weakening of local linkages if knowledge networking is predominantly global. Overall, in balancing global with the local, young high-technology companies seek different ways dependent on progressing in their lifecycle and specific strategic choices. JEL Classification

Who Are the Knowledge Brokers in Regional Systems of Innovation? A Multi-Actor Network Analysis

“…Therefore, it is argued that successful innovation is based on the appropriation of specialized regional know-how, on the one hand, and globally dispersed knowledge, on the other hand (BATHELT et al, 2004). A global orientation typically is found with innovation intensive firms in advanced stages of development (GEENHUIZEN, 2007). These findings correspond to the industry-life-cycle and the cluster-life-cycle-hypothesis, suggesting that economic activity is more geographically dispersed as the industries mature (SWANN, 1998;AUDRETSCH and FELDMAN, 1996).…”

Knowledge Virtualization and Local Connectedness Among Smart High-Tech Companies

“…rough set analysis and dealing with a small sample of young, high-tech companies in the Netherlands, the study addresses the following questions: (1) which factors are shaping the geographical scale of knowledge networks and to what extent is global knowledge networking in innovation supported by virtualization, and (2) how are changing global knowledge networks affecting local connectedness of companies? Compared with previous work (Van Geenhuizen, 2008aGeenhuizen, , 2008b) more in-depth results have been gained, due to a stronger emphasis on virtualization and on influence of different types of global knowledge relations (MNC context) on local connectedness.…”

“…Further, the value of 1.0 for the quality of the core means that the reliability of the classification for the dependent variable and the overall quality of the information table are at their maximum. Source: Adapted from van Geenhuizen (2005van Geenhuizen ( , 2008b …”

“…This procedure has revealed rather satisfactory outcomes, witness an average prediction accuracy of around 75% (see, for details, van Geenhuizen, 2008b;Soetanto and van Geenhuizen, 2007).…”

High Performance in Complex Spatial Systems: A Self-Organizing Mapping Approach with Reference to the Netherlands

“…The new innovation theory (Acs et al, 2002) has clearly demonstrated that innovative and creative firms 2 are key actors in the economic change and transformation process of cities and regions. The interface between the business performance of individual firms and the socio-economic development of cities and regions calls for a thorough analysis of complex spatial systems, with due attention to the dynamic drivers of, and effects on, balanced regional development ( van Geenhuizen, 2007;Kourtit et al, 2011a).…”