2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling discontinuous dynamic recrystallization using a physically based model for nucleation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A lot of researchers have placed attention on using different measures to analyze flow stress and dynamic recrystallization. Cram [6] extended and successfully applied a physically based description for nucleation in static recrystallization to nucleation during dynamic recrystallization (DRX), and comparisons between experiment and model calculations showed good agreement over a wide range of deformation temperature, initial grain size, and applied strain rate. Beltran [7] developed and validated a model describing recrystallization in metallic materials capable of handling DRX, post-dynamic recrystallization (PDRX), and grain growth against experimental test cases for multi-pass hot deformation of 304L austenitic stainless steel, predicting microstructural evolution due to different recrystallization regimes through a modified Kocks-Mecking equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of researchers have placed attention on using different measures to analyze flow stress and dynamic recrystallization. Cram [6] extended and successfully applied a physically based description for nucleation in static recrystallization to nucleation during dynamic recrystallization (DRX), and comparisons between experiment and model calculations showed good agreement over a wide range of deformation temperature, initial grain size, and applied strain rate. Beltran [7] developed and validated a model describing recrystallization in metallic materials capable of handling DRX, post-dynamic recrystallization (PDRX), and grain growth against experimental test cases for multi-pass hot deformation of 304L austenitic stainless steel, predicting microstructural evolution due to different recrystallization regimes through a modified Kocks-Mecking equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore the predicted grain size distributions are improved as compared to former mean field models [14,15,16,17] even if their are still quite far from experimental ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…2, the grain boundary migration of a specific grain depends 130 on the average microstructure through the values R * and ρ * , which means that no realistic topology is considered in pre-existing mean field models [14,15,16,17]. An attempt to take a realistic topology into account is presented in section 3.…”
Section: Constitutive Laws For Mean Field Modeling Of Drxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The volumetric term is considered in the models of [29,30] while the boundary energy term is used in the models of [22,31]. Using (5), the driving force F for grain boundary migration will be related to the energy change occurring as the size of the grain is changed, i.e.…”
Section: Evolution Laws and Recrystallization Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%