2018
DOI: 10.5194/tc-12-189-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling debris transport within glaciers by advection in a full-Stokes ice flow model

Abstract: Abstract. Glaciers with extensive surface debris cover respond differently to climate forcing than those without supraglacial debris. In order to include debris-covered glaciers in projections of glaciogenic runoff and sea level rise and to understand the paleoclimate proxy recorded by such glaciers, it is necessary to understand the manner and timescales over which a supraglacial debris cover develops. Because debris is delivered to the glacier by processes that are heterogeneous in space and time, and these … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that debris‐covered tongues can be generally characterized as flatter and located at lower elevations than debris‐free tongues. Moreover, the avalanche contributing area correlates strongly with the percentage of debris cover, hinting that large part of the debris supply originates from the glacier upper reaches (e.g., Wirbel et al, ). These conclusions are in line with those of Scherler et al (), even though, contrary to them, we do not include ice surface velocity in our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our results show that debris‐covered tongues can be generally characterized as flatter and located at lower elevations than debris‐free tongues. Moreover, the avalanche contributing area correlates strongly with the percentage of debris cover, hinting that large part of the debris supply originates from the glacier upper reaches (e.g., Wirbel et al, ). These conclusions are in line with those of Scherler et al (), even though, contrary to them, we do not include ice surface velocity in our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The pronounced effect of debris should therefore not be ignored in numerical experiments to determine the future evolution of mountain glaciers, yet only few studies have included this complex process in time-dependent models (e.g. Jouvet et al, 2011;Rowan et al, 2015;Huss and Fischer, 2016;Kienholz et al, 2017;Rezepkin and Popovnin, 2018;Wirbel et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debris currently found at the glacier's centreline has either moved there by secondary processes such as glacier movement and on-glacier sliding, or originated from other sources, e.g. headwall erosion (Benn and Owen, 2002) or basal debris, (re-)emerging at the glacier surface towards the tongue (Boulton, 1978;Wirbel et al, 2018).…”
Section: Debris Distribution Onto the Glaciermentioning
confidence: 99%