2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2012.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling CO2 degassing from small acidic rivers using water pCO2, DIC and δ13C-DIC data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
96
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CO 2 degassing can occur more rapidly when there is a greater difference between partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the air and in the water, as would be indicated by heightened DIC concentrations [43]. Calculated pCO 2 values based on reported DIC concentrations demonstrated that both tributaries to the AR were supersaturated with carbon dioxide in respect to the theoretical atmospheric value of~390 ppm [44].…”
Section: Sources and Processes Determining Dissolved Inorganic Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 degassing can occur more rapidly when there is a greater difference between partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the air and in the water, as would be indicated by heightened DIC concentrations [43]. Calculated pCO 2 values based on reported DIC concentrations demonstrated that both tributaries to the AR were supersaturated with carbon dioxide in respect to the theoretical atmospheric value of~390 ppm [44].…”
Section: Sources and Processes Determining Dissolved Inorganic Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent approaches have used stable carbon isotopes of dissolved inorganic carbon to reliably quantify CO 2 outgassing from streams and rivers (Polsenaere and Abril, 2012;Venkiteswaran et al, 2014), in which the model by Venkiteswaran et al (2014) is a parsimonious, simpler version of the model by Polsenaere and Abril (2012). Both apply inverse modelling to calculate the amount of CO 2 lost upstream of a sampling point within a stream or at a catchment outlet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One clear advantage when compared to conventional methods is that these stable isotope approaches account for the potentially high CO 2 outgassing upstream of any sampling point. Moreover, they incorporate groundwater seeps in first-order headwaters, particularly at low discharge (Polsenaere and Abril, 2012). These factors are typically not covered by conventional methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations