2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2009.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling atmospheric and induced non-tidal oceanic loading contributions to surface gravity and tilt measurements

Abstract: , et al.. Modelling atmospheric and induced non-tidal oceanic loading contributions to surface gravity and tilt measurements. Journal of Geodynamics, Elsevier, 2009, 48 (3-5) This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This loading contribution is evaluated for angular distances larger than 0.258 from the station (called the ''nonlocal'' part) and the local contribution is computed from the local pressure records and a nominal admittance in the 0.258 radius ''cylinder'' around the station from the same loading model (23.06679 nm/s 2 /hPa). The ocean response is included in the nonlocal calculation using the MOG2D nontidal ocean model [Carrère and Lyard, 2003] which has shown to perform better than the classical inverted barometer hypothesis [Boy and Lyard, 2008;Boy et al, 2009]. Details of atmospheric corrections for the Djougou SG station can be found in Hinderer et al [2014b] and Hector et al [2014].…”
Section: B21 Data Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This loading contribution is evaluated for angular distances larger than 0.258 from the station (called the ''nonlocal'' part) and the local contribution is computed from the local pressure records and a nominal admittance in the 0.258 radius ''cylinder'' around the station from the same loading model (23.06679 nm/s 2 /hPa). The ocean response is included in the nonlocal calculation using the MOG2D nontidal ocean model [Carrère and Lyard, 2003] which has shown to perform better than the classical inverted barometer hypothesis [Boy and Lyard, 2008;Boy et al, 2009]. Details of atmospheric corrections for the Djougou SG station can be found in Hinderer et al [2014b] and Hector et al [2014].…”
Section: B21 Data Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nontidal ocean loading effects were acquired from EOST Loading Service (Boy et al, ) utilizing ECCO‐JPL (Fukumori, ), ECCO2 (Menemenlis et al, ), and TUGOm (Loren & Florent, ) models (download at loading.u-strasbg.fr, access date 28 February 2018). In addition, nontidal ocean mass variations of the OMCTv06 model (Dobslaw et al, ) were converted to their gravity effect using mGlobe.…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) contains a large 120 nanoradian tilt oscillation following the great magnitude 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake in 11.3.2011 (Japan). The atmospheric loading tilt time series was provided by Boy et al (2009) and it is compared also to de-tided tilt meter observations described above (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Loading By the Baltic Sea And Atmospheric Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent atmospheric and nontidal ocean loading time series for gravity and tilt is available e.g. by Boy et al (2009). They modelled ocean response to air pressure variation according to the inverted barometer principle and taking into account general ocean circulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%