2020
DOI: 10.26226/morressier.5e4fe9c06bc493207536f8d1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and Simulation of Bicycle Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Users, in fact, faithfully reflect the behaviours that they would have in realistic cycling on the road according to attention and workload. This factor is further confirmed by the questionnaires, where 90% of cyclists believe that the simulated scenario and the bicycle itself allow them to feel as if they are moving in reality [62]. Moreover, 80% of the participants, being enclosed by seven screens that provide a wide field of view (FOV) and a lateral and rear view, underline that the graphic fluidity (with FPS never below 60) and By performing a cumulative analysis of the attention data, a 4% difference between the site and simulator (p < 0.03) is observed.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Users, in fact, faithfully reflect the behaviours that they would have in realistic cycling on the road according to attention and workload. This factor is further confirmed by the questionnaires, where 90% of cyclists believe that the simulated scenario and the bicycle itself allow them to feel as if they are moving in reality [62]. Moreover, 80% of the participants, being enclosed by seven screens that provide a wide field of view (FOV) and a lateral and rear view, underline that the graphic fluidity (with FPS never below 60) and By performing a cumulative analysis of the attention data, a 4% difference between the site and simulator (p < 0.03) is observed.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The analysis of the first questionnaire shows that 7 of the participants had participated in a previous experiment using the same bicycle simulator before the recent improvement [1]. 8 of them declared sensitivity to motion sickness; 5 of them when reading during travelling.…”
Section: E Subjective Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is an extended version of our previous work on modeling and simulation of bicycle dynamics published in [1] and on subjective validity of bicycle simulators published in [2]. Hereinafter, we present more details on the recent developments of the simulator and the underlying mathematical model, as well as its physical and subjective experimental validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More often than not, accidents involving a bicycle are hazardous for cyclists since they are unprotected against the car's mass. The mass of a typical car is at least an order of magnitude greater than a bicycle, and has top speeds that are considerably faster than bicycle speed, making the impact forces noticeably high during the accidents [2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%