2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-018-1186-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and multi-objective optimization of surface roughness and kerf taper angle in abrasive water jet machining of steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, RSM allows us to generate different contour diagrams or response surfaces from a second order polynomial Equation (1). There are several articles that have implemented this type of equation in order to develop the results obtained in the experiments carried out [31,33,34].…”
Section: Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, RSM allows us to generate different contour diagrams or response surfaces from a second order polynomial Equation (1). There are several articles that have implemented this type of equation in order to develop the results obtained in the experiments carried out [31,33,34].…”
Section: Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is remarkable to determine the factor effects by using the data mean. Under these tables, the factor effects can be observed intuitively [40][41][42]. Table 6 shows that bending temperature (C), bending pressure (D) and cooling rate (E) have extremely important effects on the product residual stress.…”
Section: Orthogonal Experimental Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface geometry has also been explored [14] to [18]. Due to the dynamics of the abrasive jet of water, the cut kerf results tapered, with unparalleled walls (Fig.…”
Section: • This Research Proved That Machining Hardox Steels By Abrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), the dimension on the face where the cutting jet enters the material (EN_D) is higher than the one obtained at the surface where the cutting jet exits the material (EX_D). This phenomenon was mathematically modelled by both scientific research [14] and [15] and equipment manufacturers who attempted to compensate it by using a so-called "dynamic jet" [1] and [3]. However, the phenomenon remains when the equipment has a usual cutting head without dynamic tilting of the waterjet.…”
Section: • This Research Proved That Machining Hardox Steels By Abrasmentioning
confidence: 99%