2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and experimental analysis of the effects of tool wear on form errors in stainless steel blanking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hernandez et al [15] have proposed to decompose the punch worn profile in three zones: face wear, cutting edge wear and flank wear (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Punch Wear Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hernandez et al [15] have proposed to decompose the punch worn profile in three zones: face wear, cutting edge wear and flank wear (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Punch Wear Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wear, during the blanking process, causes the change of cutting surface quality and the burr height (Ref [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. As a result of tool cutting edge friction wear the cutting radius increase, which significantly affects on the blanking process energy consumption (Ref 12,13), whereas Hernández et al (Ref 8) studied the effect of punch flank surface wear on the burr height.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production of the sheared blank elements, with a certain quality, requires an optimal process parameters selection [4,6,11,30]. Gréban et al in their work [6] presented the effects of copper alloy elements blanking process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tekiner et al [30] described the result of experimental analysis of the aluminum alloy element blanking process. Hernández and other authors [11] presented the influence of the punch cutting edge geometry changes on the cut surface quality. They described the influence of the blanking process clearance and punch diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%