2018
DOI: 10.1093/biolinnean/bly141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling allometry: statistical and biological considerations – a reply to Packard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1). This is relevant to ongoing debates on whether allometries are best studied on arithmetic or logarithmic scales (see Lemaître et al 2015;Packard 2015;Pélabon et al 2018 for a manifestation in relation to horns and antlers). It has been argued that biological deviations from the statistical model tend to be multiplicative and thus homoscedastic on a proportional (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1). This is relevant to ongoing debates on whether allometries are best studied on arithmetic or logarithmic scales (see Lemaître et al 2015;Packard 2015;Pélabon et al 2018 for a manifestation in relation to horns and antlers). It has been argued that biological deviations from the statistical model tend to be multiplicative and thus homoscedastic on a proportional (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, for promoters of the traditional approach this viewpoint sacrifices appreciation of biological theory in order to privilege statistical correctness (Houle et al 2011;Lemaître et al 2015;Pélabon et al 2018). The approach underwent here demonstrates that a merging of points above can be achieved by evoking Huxley's report on the existence of a breakpoint in the loglog plot of chela mass vs body mass of fiddler crabs (Uca pugnax) (Huxley, 1924;Huxley, 1927;Huxley, 1932 (Julious, 2001;Muggeo, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…On Huxley's elucidation (Huxley, 1932) the intercept of TAMA's line was of no specific biological importance, but the slope was significant enough as to mean allometry itself. This interpretation has permeated contemporary research to such an extent that many practitioners still consider it to be the valid theoretical perspective for static and ontogenetic allometry (Eberhard, 2009;Houle et al 2011;Pélabon et al 2018). But, there are views that assert that a TAMA approach produces inconsistent results, thereby recommending allometric examination by relying instead on nonlinear regression of in the direct scales of data (Packard, 2017a;Packard, 2013;Packard, 2009;Packard & Birchard, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, in Huxley's rationale the intercept lnβ of TAMA's line was of no explicit biological relevance, but the slope α was significant enough as to mean allometry itself. This interpretation maintains nowadays as the only valid theoretical perspective for many practitioners of allometry [57][58][59]. However, in spite of TAMA's prevalence, there are views asserting this scheme produces biased results [60][61][62][63][64].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%