“…But, there are views that assert that a TAMA approach produces inconsistent results, thereby recommending allometric examination by relying instead on nonlinear regression of in the direct scales of data (Packard, 2017a;Packard, 2013;Packard, 2009;Packard & Birchard, 2008). This is, debatable for defenders of the traditional approach that claim that, as it is conceived in the original theoretical context of allometry, a logarithmic transformation deems necessary in the analysis (Lai et al 2013, Klingenberg, 1998Nevill et al 2005;Kerkhoff & Enquist, 2009;Xiao et al 2011;White et al 2012;Ballantyne, 2013;Glazier, 2013;Niklas & Hammond, 2014;Lemaître et al 2015;Pélabon et al 2018). Yet steering further away from Huxley's perspective on covariation among different traits, other views conceive allometry centered on the covariation between size and shape (Mosimann, 1970;Klingenberg, 2016).…”