Conservation of eelgrass relies on transplants and evaluation of success depends on nondestructive measurements of average leaf biomass in shoots among other variables. Allometric proxies offer a convenient way to assessments. Identifying surrogates via log transformation and linear regression can set biased results. Views conceive this approach to be meaningful, asserting that curvature in geometrical space explains bias. Inappropriateness of correction factor of retransformation bias could also explain inconsistencies. Accounting for nonlinearity of the log transformed response relied on a generalized allometric model. Scaling parameters depend continuously on the descriptor. Joining correction factor is conceived as the partial sum of series expansion of mean retransformed residuals leading to highest reproducibility strength. Fits of particular characterizations of the generalized curvature model conveyed outstanding reproducibility of average eelgrass leaf biomass in shoots. Although nonlinear heteroscedastic regression resulted also to be suitable, only log transformation approaches can unmask a size related differentiation in growth form of the leaf. Generally, whenever structure of regression error is undetermined, choosing a suitable form of retransformation correction factor becomes elusive. Compared to customary nonparametric characterizations of this correction factor, present form proved more efficient. We expect that offered generalized allometric model along with proposed correction factor form provides a suitable analytical arrangement for the general settings of allometric examination.

No abstract

(1) Background: We previously demonstrated that customary regression protocols for curvature in geometrical space all derive from a generalized model of complex allometry combining scaling parameters expressing as continuous functions of covariate. Results highlighted the relevance of addressing suitable complexity in enhancing the accuracy of allometric surrogates of plant biomass units. Nevertheless, examination was circumscribed to particular characterizations of the generalized model. Here we address the general identification problem. (2) Methods: We first suggest a log-scales protocol composing a mixture of linear models weighted by exponential powers. Alternatively, adopting an operating regime-based modeling slant we offer mixture regression or Takagi–Sugeno–Kang arrangements. This last approach allows polyphasic identification in direct scales. A derived index measures the extent on what complexity in arithmetic space drives curvature in arithmetical space. (3) Results: Fits on real and simulated data produced proxies of outstanding reproducibility strength indistinctly of data scales. (4) Conclusions: Presented analytical constructs are expected to grant efficient allometric projection of plant biomass units and also for the general settings of allometric examination. A traditional perspective deems log-transformation and allometry inseparable. Recent views assert that this leads to biased results. The present examination suggests this controversy can be resolved by addressing adequately the complexity of geometrical space protocols

BackgroundEelgrass grants important ecological benefits including a nursery for waterfowl and fish species, shoreline stabilization, nutrient recycling and carbon sequestration. Upon the exacerbation of deleterious anthropogenic influences, re-establishment of eelgrass beds has mainly depended on transplantation. Productivity estimations provide valuable information for the appraisal of the restoration of ecological functions of natural populations. Assessments over early stages of transplants should preferably be nondestructive. Allometric scaling of eelgrass leaf biomass in terms of matching length provides a proxy that reduces leaf biomass and productivity estimations to simple measurements of leaf length and its elongation over a period. We examine how parameter variability impacts the accuracy of the considered proxy and the extent on what data quality and sample size influence the uncertainties of the involved allometric parameters.MethodsWe adapted a Median Absolute Deviation data quality control procedure to remove inconsistencies in the crude data. For evaluating the effect of parametric uncertainty we performed both a formal exploration and an analysis of the sensitivity of the allometric projection method to parameter changes. We used parameter estimates obtained by means of nonlinear regression from crude as well as processed data.ResultsWe obtained reference leaf growth rates by allometric projection using parameter estimates produced by the crude data, and then considered changes in fitted parameters bounded by the modulus of the vector of the linked standard errors, we found absolute deviations up to 10 % of reference values. After data quality control, the equivalent maximum deviation was under 7 % of corresponding reference rates. Therefore, the addressed allometric method is robust. Even the smaller sized samples in the quality controlled dataset produced better accuracy levels than the whole set of crude data.ConclusionsWe propose quality control of data as a highly recommended step in the overall procedure that leads to reliable allometric surrogates of eelgrass leaf growth rates. The proliferation of inconsistent replicates in the crude data points towards the importance of discarding incomplete leaves. We also recommend avoiding errors in estimating the biomass of small leaves for which precision of the used analytical scale might be an issue.

No abstract