2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0886-7798(00)00055-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling tunnel boring machine performance by neuro-fuzzy methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to variation in geotechnical conditions and machine operational parameters in tunneling, artificial intelligence (AI) based models have been successfully employed by some researchers to develop TBM performance prediction models (Alvarez Grima et al, 2000;Ghasemi et al, 2014;Mahdevari et al, 2014). One of the disadvantages of AI systems has been the lack of access of an end user to the software for their predictions.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to variation in geotechnical conditions and machine operational parameters in tunneling, artificial intelligence (AI) based models have been successfully employed by some researchers to develop TBM performance prediction models (Alvarez Grima et al, 2000;Ghasemi et al, 2014;Mahdevari et al, 2014). One of the disadvantages of AI systems has been the lack of access of an end user to the software for their predictions.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complexity of TBM performance prediction, beyond mathematical and empirical solutions, artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been widely utilized by many researchers (Alvarez Grima et al, 2000;Okubo et al, 2003;Gholamnejad and Tayarani, 2010;Ghasemi et al, 2014). Mahdevari et al (2014) used a support vector regression analysis (SVR) to predict penetration rate based on data from the Queens Water Tunnel, in New York City.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing prediction approaches include theoretical and empirical models (Barton 2000;Sapigni et al 2002), simple and multiple regression analyses (Delisio and Zhao 2014;Farrokh et al 2012;Khademi Hamidi et al 2010), artificial intelligence techniques such as artificial neural networks (Benardos and Kaliampakos 2004;Salimi et al 2016;Shao et al 2013), fuzzy inference systems (Acaroglu et al 2008;Alvarez Grima et al 2000;Yazdani-Chamzini et al 2013), support vector regression analysis (Mahdevari et al 2014), particle swarm optimization (Yagiz and Karahan 2011) and other advanced optimization algorithms (Yagiz and Karahan 2015). In general, these models are established on the basis of experience gained and the data compiled from the past tunneling projects in order to derive the complex and non-linear relationship between the TBM penetration rate and the influencing rock mass parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available studies, e.g. those analyzing the Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) penetration rate (Alvarez Grima et al, 2000;Sapigni M. et al, 2002;Chung et al, 2006), only capture a part of the uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%