2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling top height growth of red alder plantations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among silvicultural treatments, thinning is one of the most common and effective silvicultural practices for regulating competition between individual trees, and gives an advantage to the selected remaining trees (Pretzsch 2009). Previous thinning studies have demonstrated a strong effect on the individual tree diameter and volume growth with decreasing stand density (M€ akinen & Isom€ aki 2004;Kim et al 2016), and weak effect on height growth (Weiskittel et al 2009). Forest stand diameter and height, which are important variables in forest growth modeling, can be defined either as mean or dominant stand diameter and height (Tarmu et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among silvicultural treatments, thinning is one of the most common and effective silvicultural practices for regulating competition between individual trees, and gives an advantage to the selected remaining trees (Pretzsch 2009). Previous thinning studies have demonstrated a strong effect on the individual tree diameter and volume growth with decreasing stand density (M€ akinen & Isom€ aki 2004;Kim et al 2016), and weak effect on height growth (Weiskittel et al 2009). Forest stand diameter and height, which are important variables in forest growth modeling, can be defined either as mean or dominant stand diameter and height (Tarmu et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dominant stand height, which is suggested to be a better measure of site productivity, is widely used in other countries (van Laar & Akça, 1997;Burkhart & Tomé, 2012) and could also be an alternative for Estonia. A primary prerequisite in using dominant height as a site index productivity measurement, instead of mean height, is that the height growth of dominant trees is not so greatly influenced by stand density (Weiskittel et al, 2009). Therefore, the use of dominant height should be a more precise way of evaluating stand growth (Burkhart & Tomé, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, PSPs are usually created for experimentation, which is mainly done in sites with better conditions for tree growth. In the case of national forest inventory (NFI) data, the results from permanent sample plots are usually representative of large areas rather than local site conditions [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%