2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00857.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy for Arable Crops under Uncertainty

Abstract: The size of the insurance and wealth effects of a change in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) for arable crops is estimated. The impact of price uncertainty is accounted for in the specific decision-making structure of the European Union (EU) arable crop producers under nonlinear mean-variance risk preferences. A system of output supply, input demand, and land allocation equations is estimated on a sample of Italian specialized arable crop farms. The simulation of the impact of the recent reforms confirms t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

7
68
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
68
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Fraser and Legwegoh believe that national policies are needed to ensure adequate food storage [33]. Paul [34] and Sckokm [35] also thinks so.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fraser and Legwegoh believe that national policies are needed to ensure adequate food storage [33]. Paul [34] and Sckokm [35] also thinks so.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also allows for analysis regarding the impacts of policy reforms on the crop mix as well as on the use of agricultural inputs. Although previous analyses focused on the effects of the CAP reforms (see Serra et al, 2005;Oude Lansink and Peerlings, 1996;Moro and Sckokai, 2006;and OECD, 2006), no previous studies have used a distance function to assess the impacts of decoupling of farm production decisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chau and de Gorter 2005;de Gorter 2007;Goodwin and Mishra, 2006;Hennessy, 1998;OECD, 2001OECD, , 2004Serra et al, 2005;Sckokai and Moro, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%