2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgra.50409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the recovery phase of extreme geomagnetic storms

Abstract: [1] The recovery phase of the largest storms ever recorded has been studied. These events provide an extraordinary opportunity for two goals: (1) to validate the hyperbolic model by Aguado et al. (2010) for the recovery phase after disturbances as severe as the Carrington event or that related to the Hydro-Quebec blackout in March 1989, and (2) to check whether the linear relationship between the recovery time and the intensity of the storm still complies. Our results reveal the high accuracy of the hyperbolic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although at that time the magnetic observatories used to produce Dst were not in operation, the Dst minimum value for this event was first estimated by Siscoe (1979) to be about À2000 nT. More recently, Lakhina et al (2005) and Cid et al (2013) provided new estimations of À1760 nT and À685 nT, respectively. In any case, the so-called Carrington storm is ranked, according to the Dst index, as the most extreme geomagnetic storm ever recorded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although at that time the magnetic observatories used to produce Dst were not in operation, the Dst minimum value for this event was first estimated by Siscoe (1979) to be about À2000 nT. More recently, Lakhina et al (2005) and Cid et al (2013) provided new estimations of À1760 nT and À685 nT, respectively. In any case, the so-called Carrington storm is ranked, according to the Dst index, as the most extreme geomagnetic storm ever recorded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated recovery was much slower than the observed one. Aguado et al (2010) proposed a hyperbolic model of storm recovery, and Cid et al (2013) applied the model to intense storms including the Carrington storm. They showed high accuracy of the hyperbolic function to reproduce the rapid recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed high accuracy of the hyperbolic function to reproduce the rapid recovery. Aguado et al (2010) and Cid et al (2013) commented on the existence of diverse processes responsible for the two-step recovery. However, they did not mention about the relative significance of ion loss processes that could occur in the inner magnetosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cid et al (2013) show the high accuracy of the hyperbolic fitting in reproducing the recovery phase of Dst index in extreme storms. Figure 5 shows, as an example, the results of the hyperbolic decay fitting to one of the extreme geomagnetic events: the large storm in July 1928 recorded at Alibag magnetometer.…”
Section: About the Recovery Phasementioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, no term in the BMR equation considers that the Dst decrease in HILDCAAs is related to fluctuations in B z , since the duration of the southward B z component is not long enough to explain the phenomenon. Cid et al (2013) have undertaken a study to check the cause-effect relationship during the main phase of the storm between duskward interplanetary electric fields, E y , and the decrease of the SYM-H index which, with 1-min resolution, can be regarded as a high resolution Dst index (Wanliss & Showalter 2006). Their results suggest that an injection function which depends only on E y cannot explain the energy released from the solar wind to the terrestrial magnetosphere for timescales shorter than 8 h. Moreover, they show that there is some missing energy in the energy-balance equation between the interplanetary medium and the magnetosphere for those events where SYM-H decreases fast (À100 nT in <8 h).…”
Section: About the Injection Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%