The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the organic matter of water using the decision tree coupled with bootstrap aggregated and least-squares boosting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to assess the performance of the ANN, the mean square error (MSE) was calculated to demonstrate the statistical difference between the predicted and experimental values [ 12 , 15 ]. The accuracy of the developed model was assessed by the value of the correlation coefficient R 2 [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess the performance of the ANN, the mean square error (MSE) was calculated to demonstrate the statistical difference between the predicted and experimental values [ 12 , 15 ]. The accuracy of the developed model was assessed by the value of the correlation coefficient R 2 [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GBDT also ts the error residual of the previous tree into a decision tree. Therefore, every new tree in the community is focused on reducing the error made by the previous weak learner rather than predicting the target directly (Inria 2022;Tahraoui et al 2022). The aforementioned structure of the GDBT is very useful for spatial distribution models of soil properties, that are highly affected by environmental factors such as organic carbon and have high spatial variation, under the number of covariates is limited.…”
Section: Gradient Boosted Decision Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the developed models was examined using statistical analysis and ANOVA at a 95% confidence level. Various model quality measures, such as the p-value, F-value, degree of freedom (DF), coefficient of determination (R 2 ), adjusted determination of coefficient (R adj 2 ), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), were used to evaluate the statistical adequacy of the models [15,25,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. The F-value describes the variation in the responses, which can be evaluated using a regression equation, whereas the p-value indicates the statistical adequacy of the developed model.…”
Section: Statistical Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%