2009
DOI: 10.1021/jp809338t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Melting Enthalpy of Nanomaterials

Abstract: We report a theoretical investigation, free of any adjustable parameters, concerning the size and shape effects on the melting enthalpy, for different shapes of "free-standing" nanostructures. To easily calculate the nanoscale melting enthalpy for a wide range of metals and semiconductors, a convenient shape parameter (R shape ) is defined. A comparison between the Guisbiers et al., Jiang et al., and Shandiz et al. models with experimental and molecular dynamics results is done. Until D ∼ 10 nm, the size effe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6b). The melting enthalpy of Au-Sn ANPs at 186°C (24.64 J/ g) is in agreement with the theoretical calculation presented by Guisbiers and Buchaillot [25] for nanomaterials and is lower than that of the Au-Sn bulk alloy at 30% Au (37.07 J/g). The depression in melting point of ANPs solder can be the result of decrease in size and shape.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…6b). The melting enthalpy of Au-Sn ANPs at 186°C (24.64 J/ g) is in agreement with the theoretical calculation presented by Guisbiers and Buchaillot [25] for nanomaterials and is lower than that of the Au-Sn bulk alloy at 30% Au (37.07 J/g). The depression in melting point of ANPs solder can be the result of decrease in size and shape.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…And, we can predict that the melting enthalpy is likely to decrease to zero as the particle size decreases to a certain extent. This downward trend also manifests itself in other substances, such as In, [9,[32][33][34] Sn, [8,9,35] Al, [35] etc. This can be attributed to the higher surface energy for nanoparticles.…”
Section: Size Dependence Of the Melting Enthalpy Of Nano-aumentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Here R is the ideal gas constant, ∼8.314 J mol −1 K −1 ; h is the atomic diameter, ∼0.256 nm for Cu; and S vib is the vibrational contribution of overall melting entropy of bulk crystals, which is a weak function of d, and could be ignored as a first-order approximation [21], that S vib (d) ≈ S vib (∞) ≈ 7.85 J mol −1 K −1 [23]. Substituting σ sl (d) and S vib (d) into Eq.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%