2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the dynamics of distribution, extent, and NPP of global terrestrial ecosystems in response to future climate change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Vulnerable zones indicate areas where relatively rapid environmental changes occur within the boundary of the study area, but cannot be construed as absolutely vulnerable areas because species responses to the changes would differ. However, this result is consistent with the findings of other previous studies that predict changes in biomes or terrestrial vegetation because of climate change [29,[58][59][60]. In particular, [60] predicted a significant increase in net primary productivity (NPP) in tropical forests and temperate forests, but a decrease in NPP in sub-tropical forests and south temperate forests.…”
Section: Evaluation Results Of Bvi and Nisupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Vulnerable zones indicate areas where relatively rapid environmental changes occur within the boundary of the study area, but cannot be construed as absolutely vulnerable areas because species responses to the changes would differ. However, this result is consistent with the findings of other previous studies that predict changes in biomes or terrestrial vegetation because of climate change [29,[58][59][60]. In particular, [60] predicted a significant increase in net primary productivity (NPP) in tropical forests and temperate forests, but a decrease in NPP in sub-tropical forests and south temperate forests.…”
Section: Evaluation Results Of Bvi and Nisupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, this result is consistent with the findings of other previous studies that predict changes in biomes or terrestrial vegetation because of climate change [29,[58][59][60]. In particular, [60] predicted a significant increase in net primary productivity (NPP) in tropical forests and temperate forests, but a decrease in NPP in sub-tropical forests and south temperate forests. In general, they conclude that ecosystems in the mid to high latitudes would be more vulnerable to future climate change in terms of distribution ranges and NPP.…”
Section: Evaluation Results Of Bvi and Nisupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Two 30-year periods have been considered: the first one ) is the baseline period or reference climate (RC), whereas the other is the last 30 years of the 21st century (2071-2100), named the future climate (FC) here. The period 1961-1990 has been employed in numerous previous studies on climate change projections and impacts, even very recently (e.g., Giorgi and Lionello, 2008;Smiatek et al, 2009;Ciscar et al, 2011;KyselĂœ et al, 2011;Torma et al, 2011;Heinrich et al, 2014;Perez et al, 2014;SkalĂĄk et al, 2014;Belda et al, 2015;Dunford et al, 2015;Faggian, 2015;Casajus et al, 2016;Harrison et al, 2016;Gang et al, 2017;Paeth et al, 2017). It had also been used in various climate projection projects using GCMs and/or RCMs, such as CMIP3/CMIP5, PRUDENCE, ENSEMBLES, and CECILIA.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two 30-year periods have been considered: the first one is the baseline period or reference climate (RC), whereas the other is the last 30 years of the 21st century (2071-2100), named the future climate (FC) here. The period has been employed in numerous previous studies on climate change projections and impacts, even very recently (e.g., Giorgi and Lionello, 2008;Smiatek et al, 2009;Ciscar et al, 2011;KyselĂœ et al, 2011;Torma et al, 2011;Heinrich et al, 2014;Perez et al, 2014;SkalĂĄk et al, 2014;Belda et al, 2015;Dunford et al, 2015;Faggian, 2015;Casajus et al, 2016;Harrison et al, 2016;Gang et al, 2017;Paeth et al, 2017). It had also been used in various climate projection projects using GCMs and/or RCMs, such as CMIP3/CMIP5, PRUDENCE, ENSEMBLES, and CECILIA.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%