1989
DOI: 10.1016/0893-6080(89)90027-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling some effects of frontal lobe damage—Novelty and perseveration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some models have addressed specific component processes of frontal executive functions, such as maintaining state information in working memory (Dreher, Guigon, & Burnod, 2002;Rougier & O'Reilly, 2002;Durstewitz, Seamans, & Sejnowski, 2000;Moody, Wise, Pellegrino, & Zipser, 1997) and response sequencing (Dehaene & Changeux 1997;Bapi & Levine, 1994). Several models have accounted for both context maintenance and response selection/response inhibition, e.g., in the Wisconsin Card Sorting task (Berdia & Metz, 1998;Levine & Prueitt, 1989), Stroop interference task (Cohen, Dunbar, & McClelland, 1990), verbal response selection tasks (Gullapalli & Gelfand, 1995), delayed response tasks (Guignon, Dorizzi, B., Burnod, Y., & Schultz, 1995;Dehaene & Changeux, 1989), and continuous performance tasks (Rougier & O'Reilly, 2002;Braver, Barch, & Cohen, 1999;Cohen, Braver, & O'Reilly, 1996). In most of these models, PFC units are given prespecified meanings, e.g., ''sort cards by color'' or ''name the ink color.''…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some models have addressed specific component processes of frontal executive functions, such as maintaining state information in working memory (Dreher, Guigon, & Burnod, 2002;Rougier & O'Reilly, 2002;Durstewitz, Seamans, & Sejnowski, 2000;Moody, Wise, Pellegrino, & Zipser, 1997) and response sequencing (Dehaene & Changeux 1997;Bapi & Levine, 1994). Several models have accounted for both context maintenance and response selection/response inhibition, e.g., in the Wisconsin Card Sorting task (Berdia & Metz, 1998;Levine & Prueitt, 1989), Stroop interference task (Cohen, Dunbar, & McClelland, 1990), verbal response selection tasks (Gullapalli & Gelfand, 1995), delayed response tasks (Guignon, Dorizzi, B., Burnod, Y., & Schultz, 1995;Dehaene & Changeux, 1989), and continuous performance tasks (Rougier & O'Reilly, 2002;Braver, Barch, & Cohen, 1999;Cohen, Braver, & O'Reilly, 1996). In most of these models, PFC units are given prespecified meanings, e.g., ''sort cards by color'' or ''name the ink color.''…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D iamond, 1991). F urthermore, th e context-p roviding role of the dyna mic learning-co ntext signal in O SC A R is highly similar to the role of maintaining representati ons of task -related contextu a l info r mation assigned to pre-fronta l cortex in several co mputation al models of pre-fro ntal fu nction (see, e.g., C ohen & Servan -Schreiber, 1992; C ooper & Sh allice, 1997; D ehaene & C han geux, 1989; Levine & Prueitt, 1989). It is therefore possible that the develop menta l changes in OS CA R 's learning -context signal assu med in the present account to underpin SO R d evelop ment can be related to conco mitant develop ment in fronta l lobe functio n. A similar interpretatio n of O SC A R has been given by M aylor et al (in press) in ap plying the model to chan ges in memory for serial o rder in elderly adults.…”
Section: Relation To Neurobiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of this work has been focused on deficits in word reading-the acquired dyslexias (Mozer & Behrmann, 1990;Patterson, Seidenberg, & McClelland, 1990;Plaut & Shallice, 1993a)-but there has also been considerable work in other domains, including spelling (Shallice, Glasspool, & Houghton, 1995;Olson & Caramazza, 1994), speech production (Harley & MacAndrew, 1992;Martin, Dell, & Schwartz, 1994), face recognition (Burton, Young, Bruce, Johnston, & Ellis, 1991;Farah, O'Reilly, & Vecera, 1993), visual object naming (Gordon, 1982;Plaut & Shallice, 1993b), spatial attention (Cohen, Romero, Servan-Schreiber, & Farah, 1994;Humphreys, Freeman, & Müller, 1992), learning and memory McClelland, McNaughton, & O'Reilly, 1995), semantic memory (Farah & McClelland, 1991;Horn, Ruppin, Usher, & Hermann, 1993), and control of action and responding (Bapi & Levine, 1990;Cohen & Servan-Schreiber, 1992;Levine & Prueitt, 1989). Although still in its infancy, the relative success of this work suggests that connectionist modeling may provide an appropriate formalism within which to explore how disorders of brain function give rise to disorders of cognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%