1996
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1996.0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relearning after Damage in Connectionist Networks: Toward a Theory of Rehabilitation

Abstract: Connectionist modeling offers a useful computational framework for exploring the nature of normal and impaired cognitive processes. The current work extends the relevance of connectionist modeling in neuropsychology to address issues in cognitive rehabilitation: the degree and speed of recovery through retraining, the extent to which improvement on treated items generalizes to untreated items, and how treated items are selected to maximize this generalization. A network previously used to model impairments in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
141
5
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
9
141
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulations involving partial damage to an isolated semantic route (Plaut & Shallice, 1993) provide a comprehensive account of the rather peculiar combination of symptoms exhibited by patients with deep dyslexia, including the occurrence of semantic errors (e.g., reading RIVER as "ocean"), their co-occurrence with visual errors, and influences of imageability or concreteness on correct and error performance. Furthermore, when a version of the model is retrained after damage (Plaut, 1996), the degree and variability of its recovery and generalization are qualitatively similar to the results of some cognitive rehabilitation studies. The results challenge traditional assumptions about the nature of the mechanisms subserving word reading, and illustrate the value of explicit computational simulations of normal and impaired cognitive processes.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…Simulations involving partial damage to an isolated semantic route (Plaut & Shallice, 1993) provide a comprehensive account of the rather peculiar combination of symptoms exhibited by patients with deep dyslexia, including the occurrence of semantic errors (e.g., reading RIVER as "ocean"), their co-occurrence with visual errors, and influences of imageability or concreteness on correct and error performance. Furthermore, when a version of the model is retrained after damage (Plaut, 1996), the degree and variability of its recovery and generalization are qualitatively similar to the results of some cognitive rehabilitation studies. The results challenge traditional assumptions about the nature of the mechanisms subserving word reading, and illustrate the value of explicit computational simulations of normal and impaired cognitive processes.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…All models of lexical access incorporate word frequency into their retrieval mechanisms (frequency-coded models, Forster, 1976; semantic feature models, Smith, Shoben, & Rips, 1974; Logogen models, Morton, 1969;connectionist models, McClelland & Rumelhart, 1985;Monsell, 1991;Plaut, 1996; highdimensional semantic space models, . Although these models differ with respect to the specific implementation of the WF mechanism, the basic mechanism is that WF sets a threshold for word recognition: WF is a measure of experience with a word which has some direct relationship to its availability in memory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 Several methods and strategies have evolved in the past two to three decades, addressing various cognitive deficits experienced by patients with psychiatric and neurological problems. 21 With regard to substance dependence, patients with alcohol disorders have shown improvement in cognitive functions as a result of retraining practices.…”
Section: Incorporating Cognitive Retraining Strategies For Better Outmentioning
confidence: 99%