2014 48th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 2014
DOI: 10.1109/acssc.2014.7094392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling realistic underwater acoustic networks using experimental data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…by specifying the per-link detection and decoding probabilities. The two in-built examples of this UnetStack functionality include the channel models based on the real measurements from the MISSION 2012 [51] and MISSION 2013 [52] experiments. Table I reviews the capabilities, advantages and disadvantages of the UWA channel and network simulation tools discussed in this section.…”
Section: State-of-the-art In Underwater Acoustic Channel Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by specifying the per-link detection and decoding probabilities. The two in-built examples of this UnetStack functionality include the channel models based on the real measurements from the MISSION 2012 [51] and MISSION 2013 [52] experiments. Table I reviews the capabilities, advantages and disadvantages of the UWA channel and network simulation tools discussed in this section.…”
Section: State-of-the-art In Underwater Acoustic Channel Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by specifying the per-link detection and decoding probabilities. The two in-built examples of this UnetStack functionality include the channel models based on the real measurements from the MISSION 2012 [48] and MISSION 2013 [49] experiments. Table I reviews the capabilities, advantages and disadvantages of the underwater acoustic channel and network simulation tools discussed in this section.…”
Section: State-of-the-art In Underwater Acoustic Channel Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%