2020
DOI: 10.36227/techrxiv.11958852.v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel Modeling for Underwater Acoustic Network Simulation

Abstract: This manuscript was submitted to IEEE Access on 12 Jun 2020.<div><br></div><div>Abstract:</div><div><br></div><div>Simulation forms an important part of the development and empirical evaluation of underwater acoustic network (UAN) protocols. The key feature of a credible network simulation model is a realistic channel model. A common approach to simulating realistic underwater acoustic (UWA) channels is by using specialised beam tracing software such as BEL… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider the channel model of [15]: in particular we model our UWAN with Notice that we challenge our solution by placing Eve and Alice close to each other; if Alice and Eve are located farther away, it may be easier for a node to check the authenticity of the packets, e.g., by thresholding the received power. Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the channel model of [15]: in particular we model our UWAN with Notice that we challenge our solution by placing Eve and Alice close to each other; if Alice and Eve are located farther away, it may be easier for a node to check the authenticity of the packets, e.g., by thresholding the received power. Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both arrival rates are assumed to be same for each hop. Typically, the underwater acoustic channel is quasistatic [35], [36]. This means that the fading coefficient, q k u,l , and the delay, τ k u,l , remain the same during one transmission burst, but then may change between bursts.…”
Section: A Underwater Channel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 3 shows the path-loss [10]- [12] against the distance between transmitter and receiver for different maritime channels with acoustic waves at 500 kHz frequency. It is clear that the path-loss varies with the level of water density in the wireless channel.…”
Section: B Near-sea-surface Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%