2017
DOI: 10.1364/oe.25.003656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling random screens for predefined electromagnetic Gaussian–Schell model sources

Abstract: In a previous paper [Opt. Express22, 31691 (2014)] two different wave optics methodologies (phase screen and complex screen) were introduced to generate electromagnetic Gaussian Schell-model sources. A numerical optimization approach based on theoretical realizability conditions was used to determine the screen parameters. In this work we describe a practical modeling approach for the two methodologies that employs a common numerical recipe for generating correlated Gaussian random sequences and establish exac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, we chose the transfer function simulation approach and not the impulse response approach to better simulate the free-space propagation (Ch.5 in [ 24 ]). The Gaussian RPSs were simulated by convolving an uncorrelated random signal with a Gaussian function in a similar way to the Gaussian Schell-model beam simulations [ 3 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Separating the Influence Of Individual Masks In An Optical Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, we chose the transfer function simulation approach and not the impulse response approach to better simulate the free-space propagation (Ch.5 in [ 24 ]). The Gaussian RPSs were simulated by convolving an uncorrelated random signal with a Gaussian function in a similar way to the Gaussian Schell-model beam simulations [ 3 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Separating the Influence Of Individual Masks In An Optical Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because and are independent random functions, and are also independent, and we may calculate the expected value of their involved terms separately (the third line). Assuming , then , and assuming that the spatial statistics of the RPSs are WSS, then the expected value is independent of the dummy variable and can be factored outside the integral (Ch.8 in [ 21 ], [ 25 ]), where we use the statistical AC definition (fourth line). Now we need to calculate the left term in Equation (A5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%