2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling rainfall-runoff process using soft computing techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
59
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The expressions of RMSE, MAE, E, RSR, VAF, ρ, and NMBE are given below [23][24][25][26][27]. Table 2 shows the values of different parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expressions of RMSE, MAE, E, RSR, VAF, ρ, and NMBE are given below [23][24][25][26][27]. Table 2 shows the values of different parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent time series methods, such as the neural network model (Shoaib et al [17]) and binary-coded particle swarm optimization (Taormina and Chau [18]), have shown improvement of rainfall runoff simulations. Kisi et al [19] conducted rainfall-runoff process modeling using soft computing techniques. Granata et al [20] presented vector regression for rainfall-runoff modeling in urban drainage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the GP based models have been employed for forecasting groundwater level. In fact, GP has been reported in variety of hydrologic and hydro-geologic modeling such as: flood routing (Sivapragasam et al 2008), evaporation , ground water remediation (Aly and Peralta 1999), suspended sediment modeling (Kisi et al 2012), stage discharge curve (Azamathulla et al 2011), short-term water level fluctuations (Shiri and Kisi 2011) and rainfall-runoff model (Kisi et al 2013). The detailed review of application of GP in water resources has been presented in ASCE Task Committee (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%