2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobme.2019.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling perspectives on the intestinal crypt, a canonical system for growth, mechanics, and remodeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, how the crypt folds during morphogenesis and how folding is maintained during homeostasis is not well understood. Candidate folding mechanisms include buckling as a consequence of either increased mitotic pressure [12][13][14][15] , differentials in actomyosin forces between epithelial compartments 16 , or planar cellular flows 17 . Additionally, crypt folding could arise from bending by apical constriction 18,19 , basal expansion 20 or transepithelial differences in osmotic pressure 21,22 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, how the crypt folds during morphogenesis and how folding is maintained during homeostasis is not well understood. Candidate folding mechanisms include buckling as a consequence of either increased mitotic pressure [12][13][14][15] , differentials in actomyosin forces between epithelial compartments 16 , or planar cellular flows 17 . Additionally, crypt folding could arise from bending by apical constriction 18,19 , basal expansion 20 or transepithelial differences in osmotic pressure 21,22 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed traction patterns and monolayer geometry can be explained by two classes of folding mechanisms. The first class relies on differentials in mitotic pressure [12][13][14] , which can induce a buckling instability that pushes the stem cell compartment towards the substrate. A second class is based on differentials in myosin contractility, either across the monolayer plane 16 or along the apicobasal axis [18][19][20] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have the advantage that they can be developed with a long-term view; if computational capacities are improved, further questions can be addressed based on the same model or straightforward model extensions. Exploiting these capabilities, computational tissue models have strongly supported the understanding of fate control of intestinal SCs in the last decade [ 42 ]. Here, we introduce an individual cell-based model of postnatal intestinal growth that builds on our previous models of the adult intestinal crypt [ 36 , 43 ] and intestinal organoids [ 16 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to computational models of crypt budding, they have been confined to the study of the healthy case of crypt fission. This is partly because validation of mathematical models of the crypt is particularly difficult, either due to the lack of experimental data or the difficulty to measure certain model parameters 49 , 50 . Notably, recent studies of crypt budding relate the spatial concentration of proteins (including the APC, β-catenin, E-cadherin and survivin) and cell proliferation and differentiation (including stem and mucus-secreting cells) with the crypt budding process 51 53 .…”
Section: Validation Of the 3d Cyclorama Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%