2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9512-3_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Patient Flows Through the Health care System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification of studies on applying queuing theory to healthcare service can be based upon waiting time and utilization analysis (Yeo et al, 2014), which can be further classified into those on reneging (Broyles and Cochran, 2007), variable arrival rate (Worthington, 1987), priority queuing discipline (Fiems et al, 2005) and blocking (Koizumi et al, 2005); whereas studies on system design with respect to queuing (Green et al, 2006;Park and Kwag, 2009) are classified into cost minimization (Gorunescu et al, 2002) and blocking. Based on size of the system (Hall et al, 2013), studies have been conducted at department-level which includes Departments of Internal Medicine (Hwang, 2006), Orthopaedics (Yeo et al, 2014), Emergency Room (Kim et al, 2009;Mandelbaum et al, 2012), Radiology (Park and Kwag, 2009) and MRI (Green and Savin, 2008); while those conducted at healthcare center-level had the whole outpatient department (Park, 2001;Ko, 2010;Kim et al, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The classification of studies on applying queuing theory to healthcare service can be based upon waiting time and utilization analysis (Yeo et al, 2014), which can be further classified into those on reneging (Broyles and Cochran, 2007), variable arrival rate (Worthington, 1987), priority queuing discipline (Fiems et al, 2005) and blocking (Koizumi et al, 2005); whereas studies on system design with respect to queuing (Green et al, 2006;Park and Kwag, 2009) are classified into cost minimization (Gorunescu et al, 2002) and blocking. Based on size of the system (Hall et al, 2013), studies have been conducted at department-level which includes Departments of Internal Medicine (Hwang, 2006), Orthopaedics (Yeo et al, 2014), Emergency Room (Kim et al, 2009;Mandelbaum et al, 2012), Radiology (Park and Kwag, 2009) and MRI (Green and Savin, 2008); while those conducted at healthcare center-level had the whole outpatient department (Park, 2001;Ko, 2010;Kim et al, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies on models of queuing theory are provided by Green (2006a) and analysis of the effect of waiting times on patients in the Emergency Department is given by (Siddhartan et al, 1996). The flow of patients in a queue can lead to good patient flow if the queuing is minimized whereas queuing delays can lead to patient suffering causing poor patient flow (Hall et al, 2006). The demand for health care services can be determined by effective resource allocation and capacity planning (Murray, 2000).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By completing the treatment time in ED, the patient can be admitted to another unit where they may encounter more processes and delays. Finally, the beds are prepared for the next patient after the discharge process (Hall et al 2013), where the patients are discharged from the ED.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] One of the major fundamentals in improving efficiency in the delivery of health care services is patient flow. Meaning of Good patient flow is that patient queuing is minimized and improper patient flow means that patients suffer considerable queuing delays [7] . Effective resource allocation and capacity planning are determined by patient flow because it informs the demand for health care services [8] .…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%