1988
DOI: 10.1021/es00170a002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling ozone concentrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, with the exception of NH 4 + wet deposition, good agreement for model predicted annual estimates are noted with R 2 in the range of 0.6-0.7 for both ambient concentrations (Figures 2a -2c) and wet deposition amounts (Figures 2d -2f). These correlations are reasonable given that they are based on comparing gridaveraged values with point measurements [Schere, 1988;McKeen et al, 1991]. The poor R 2 for wet NH 4 + deposition (Figure 2e) results from discrepancies between model and measurements at a few sites characterized by relatively large model over and under predictions, though the overall correlation is quite good; without the four outliers the R 2 = 0.36.…”
Section: Comparison Of Model Predictions With Measurementssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In general, with the exception of NH 4 + wet deposition, good agreement for model predicted annual estimates are noted with R 2 in the range of 0.6-0.7 for both ambient concentrations (Figures 2a -2c) and wet deposition amounts (Figures 2d -2f). These correlations are reasonable given that they are based on comparing gridaveraged values with point measurements [Schere, 1988;McKeen et al, 1991]. The poor R 2 for wet NH 4 + deposition (Figure 2e) results from discrepancies between model and measurements at a few sites characterized by relatively large model over and under predictions, though the overall correlation is quite good; without the four outliers the R 2 = 0.36.…”
Section: Comparison Of Model Predictions With Measurementssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…We therefore restrict our 10,823 comparison to afternoon conditions and compare 0 3 mixing ratios averaged from 1 to 5 p.m. EST for the last 3 days of model simulation. In using the AIRS ozone network data, caution must also be taken in making comparisons since the model predicts grid averaged quantities, and there is some concern about how representative a particular measurement is for a larger area [Schere, 1988]. Also, measurements taken in or near urban areas, which comprise a significant fraction of the total data, may be seriously influenced by local chemistry such as fitration effects by locally emitted NO.…”
Section: Results Of the Model Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time for computation is reduced by a factor of 25 relative to a 40x40 km 2 model and by a factor of 100 relative to a 20x20 km 2 model. This allows use of a complete chemical mechanism in a large-scale simulation, an important step in developing an accurate regional oxidant model [cL Schere, 1988].…”
Section: We Have Made Comparisons Between Results Of the 8-hourmentioning
confidence: 99%