Produced Water 1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2902-6_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Offshore Discharges of Produced Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The commonly used two steps model of the radionuclide dispersing and diluting in the water in the vicinity of the oil platforms predicts a diluting factor up to 10 3 within minutes and within a few meters of the discharge source [65]. Therefore, additional radium nuclide concentrations in seawater of the local zone could be estimated as equal to around 5-10 Bq/m 3 , in comparison with the 228 Ra was appraised for offshore oil production from Argentina and Brazil [66].…”
Section: Te-norm In Produced Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly used two steps model of the radionuclide dispersing and diluting in the water in the vicinity of the oil platforms predicts a diluting factor up to 10 3 within minutes and within a few meters of the discharge source [65]. Therefore, additional radium nuclide concentrations in seawater of the local zone could be estimated as equal to around 5-10 Bq/m 3 , in comparison with the 228 Ra was appraised for offshore oil production from Argentina and Brazil [66].…”
Section: Te-norm In Produced Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dilution is mainly thought of as occurring in two phases. There is the initial dilution or near-field phase which occurs in the first few minutes, and the far dilution phase that happens several hours later (Baumgartner et al, 1992, Brandsma et al, 1992.…”
Section: Risk To the Marine Environment From Components Of Produced Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PFW dilution is parameterized through the mass dilution factor 18 (S a ), which is the ratio between the effluent concentration and the cross sectional average 19 concentration in the plume. For a round shaped outfall, the densimetric Froude number 20 (Brandsma et al, 1992), which provides an estimate of the relative importance of momentum 21 and buoyancy in driving the initial mixing, is defined as: 22 where D is the outfall pipe port diameter, a the ambient density at depth of the port, e the 3 effluent density and g is gravity. U 0 represents the effluent outflow velocity and is given by: 4 5 6 2) 7 8 9 with q is the volume flux at outfall pipe port.…”
Section: Um3 Model 10mentioning
confidence: 99%