2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10762-014-0083-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of the Substrate Influence on Multielement THz Detector Operation

Abstract: The development of THz multielement uncooled imagers based on focal plane arrays (FPAs) requires an optimization of the system parameters to achieve a homogeneous sensitivity of the array elements. Results of numerical simulation of the eight-element linear array of planar antennas with detecting elements, on a substrate of finite dimensions are presented. We establish how the substrate thickness h and the relative permittivity ε r influence antenna pattern and antenna-detector matching for each element. We sh… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the distinctive properties of patch antennas with ground planes is that the lower metal planes allow for efficient suppression of radiation propagation into the thick dielectric substrate. The impact of radiation propagating in the substrate has been addressed in many works which reported about the dependencies of antenna parameters on the substrate thickness [ 100 ] and the detector’s position on the substrate [ 101 , 102 ]. Although such a phenomenon can be deliberately used to increase the antenna directivity, it might challenge estimation of the antenna’s effective area.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the distinctive properties of patch antennas with ground planes is that the lower metal planes allow for efficient suppression of radiation propagation into the thick dielectric substrate. The impact of radiation propagating in the substrate has been addressed in many works which reported about the dependencies of antenna parameters on the substrate thickness [ 100 ] and the detector’s position on the substrate [ 101 , 102 ]. Although such a phenomenon can be deliberately used to increase the antenna directivity, it might challenge estimation of the antenna’s effective area.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substrates were thick (from ≈400 up to 800 μm), which was the reason of antenna pattern degradation. In earlier studies [8,9], it was proposed to use electrically thin substrates (the substrate thickness h < 0.1λ d , where λ d is the wavelength inside the dielectric substrate). From the technological point of view, it is difficult to obtain thin substrates (d ≤ 60 µm) when excitation of substrate modes can be excluded.…”
Section: Modeling the Antenna Pattern On A Thick Substratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To decrease the substrate influence of detector response on radiation frequency, the Al 2 O 3 substrates were back thinned to the thickness d = 175 µm. Besides the suppression of the resonance modes in the substrate, and improving the antenna gain, it makes the system less sensitive to changing the frequency of radiation [17].…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%