2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of surface finish in electro-discharge machining based upon statistical multi-parameter analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dimensional analysis shows the good surface finish, MRR and tool wear [29]and result shows the less than 10% surface finish model and less than 20% MRR [30]. Single and multiple statistical regression models are found for texture parameters [31].Heat transfer model was analyzed for EDM parameters such as pulse duration,pulse energy,MRR and crater shape [32].Thermal model was illustrated by data dependent system [33].Online wire rupture monitoring system was carried out by sparking frequency monitor [34].variable mass cylindrical plasma models was introduced [35].EDM process modeling was done by artificial neural network [36].ANN provides more accurate results of the parameters such as pulse on time, pulse off time and discharge current [37]. Tangent sigmoid multi-layered perceptron(TANMLP),radial basis function network(RBFN) are used to predict the surface finish [38].More accurate result was found by this model during machining process to predict MRR [39].Surface methodology was observed for pulse on time and pulse of time which shows the optimum speed cutting of 3mm/min [40].…”
Section: VImentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Dimensional analysis shows the good surface finish, MRR and tool wear [29]and result shows the less than 10% surface finish model and less than 20% MRR [30]. Single and multiple statistical regression models are found for texture parameters [31].Heat transfer model was analyzed for EDM parameters such as pulse duration,pulse energy,MRR and crater shape [32].Thermal model was illustrated by data dependent system [33].Online wire rupture monitoring system was carried out by sparking frequency monitor [34].variable mass cylindrical plasma models was introduced [35].EDM process modeling was done by artificial neural network [36].ANN provides more accurate results of the parameters such as pulse on time, pulse off time and discharge current [37]. Tangent sigmoid multi-layered perceptron(TANMLP),radial basis function network(RBFN) are used to predict the surface finish [38].More accurate result was found by this model during machining process to predict MRR [39].Surface methodology was observed for pulse on time and pulse of time which shows the optimum speed cutting of 3mm/min [40].…”
Section: VImentioning
confidence: 88%
“…in EDM of a cemented carbide and observed that in the case of R a parameter the most influential factors are intensity, followed by the pulse time factor. Petropoulos et al (2004) have emphasized the interrelationship between surface texture parameters and process parameters in EDM of Ck60 steel plates. They have considered amplitude, spacing, hybrid, as well as random process and fractal parameters.…”
Section: Review Of Roughness Study In Machiningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-driven approaches use learning algorithms and experimental data to capture underlying influence of control parameters on outputs and build prediction models so that an in-depth understanding of underlying physical processes 2 Complexity is not a prerequisite [9]. Multivariable regression analysis [10,11], response surface methodology [12,13], artificial neural networks (ANN) [14][15][16], and support vector machine (SVM) [17][18][19] are the most widely data-driven approaches applied for modeling machined surface roughness. Other techniques like ensembles also are used for surface roughness prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%