2017
DOI: 10.1080/01691864.2017.1372214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of natural sit-to-stand movement based on minimum jerk criterion for natural-like assistance and rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to acceleration, a few studies reported that accelerations in sit-to-stand motion are associated with the difficulty the elderly have in performing STSTS [23], [52] which could explain the relationship between STSTS acceleration and HL-IADL. Moreover, the minimum jerk has been reported to be an important factor for natural and smooth sit-to-stand motion [23], [53]. This may indicate that the participants with lower HL-IADL score have impaired control of limb movements to perform natural and smooth STSTS movement.…”
Section: Biomechanical Aspects Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to acceleration, a few studies reported that accelerations in sit-to-stand motion are associated with the difficulty the elderly have in performing STSTS [23], [52] which could explain the relationship between STSTS acceleration and HL-IADL. Moreover, the minimum jerk has been reported to be an important factor for natural and smooth sit-to-stand motion [23], [53]. This may indicate that the participants with lower HL-IADL score have impaired control of limb movements to perform natural and smooth STSTS movement.…”
Section: Biomechanical Aspects Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarities across the hip, knee, and ankle joint moment waveforms between the first computer simulation and the experiment were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Moreover, to confirm whether the joint moment waveforms of the first computer simulation were quantitatively reasonable compared to those of the experiment, we used “normalized integral error” [ 34 ]. In the second computer simulation, 15 patterns of sit-to-stand movement based on different times (0.5–4.0 s at intervals of 0.25 s) were entered for each sit-to-stand movement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works have focused on the joint torque support for STS transitions with 1 DOF torso, minimizing a jerk criterion on a 3-DOF powered system [18]; or through optimal trajectories of the COM [19], demonstrated with elderly patients in [20]. In contrast to previous works where the body model was reduced to 1 degree of freedom (DOF) at the torso [14], [16], [18], [21] we concluded that a 7-DOF human biomechanical model (HBM) was more adequate to fit the transitions shown in Fig. contribute to the postural transition, therefore, in our work we include crouching of the spine (q 4 ), arms (q 5 , q 6 , q 7 ) and head in the modelling in order to determine possible postures for controlling the device motion.…”
Section: A Task Dynamics: Human Biomechanical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%