2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00181-018-1560-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling mechanism of economic growth using threshold autoregression models

Abstract: We propose to apply a time series-based nonlinear mechanism in the threshold autoregression form in order to examine the possible relationship between economic growth rate and its potential determinants included debt-to-GDP indicator. Our approach employs threshold variables instead of exogenous variables and time-series data instead of panel data to reveal the economic instruments that have determined the business cycle in European countries for the last 2 decades-starting from 1995. The purpose of the study … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TAR model sets a particular point in time where the motion of the time series jumps from one regime to another, while this jump is discrete. TAR model has better properties in fitting the actual data, compared with the linear regression model, due to its advantages in effectively identifying the nonlinear dynamic adjustment characteristics and regime transition of the time series [42]. The three-regime multi-order TAR model has the following form:…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TAR model sets a particular point in time where the motion of the time series jumps from one regime to another, while this jump is discrete. TAR model has better properties in fitting the actual data, compared with the linear regression model, due to its advantages in effectively identifying the nonlinear dynamic adjustment characteristics and regime transition of the time series [42]. The three-regime multi-order TAR model has the following form:…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, methodologically, our study captures the longitudinal discursive evolution of legitimacy evaluations by combining new digital methods such as semantic network analysis (Bonini et al, 2016;De Nooy et al, 2005;Illia et al, 2016Illia et al, , 2021 with threshold vector autoregressive model (TVAR) analysis, the latter being widely used in economics to capture business cycles (Beaudry & Koop, 1993;Osińska et al, 2020;Pesaran & Potter, 1997), interest rates (Anderson, 1997;Nyberg, 2018;Pfann et al, 1996), stock returns (Chen & Yang, 2019;Domian & Louton, 1997), prices (Aslan et al, 2018;Yadav et al, 1994), and exchange rates (Balke & Wohar, 1998;Taylor, 2001). Thereby, our study contributes to studies on organizational legitimacy in social media (Etter et al, 2018) and more broadly to studies on social approval of organizations (Bundy & Pfarrer, 2015;Wang et al, 2021) by suggesting means of combining different methods to measure the point at which a critical mass of evaluations in social media will or will not influence organizational news media legitimacy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%