1989
DOI: 10.4319/lo.1989.34.8.1510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling in situ phytoplankton absorption from total absorption spectra in productive inland marine waters

Abstract: Dissolved and suspended materials in the ocean modify the in-water light field by absorbing and scattering photons. Direct measurement of inherent optical properties of individual optical constituents is difficult since the constituents themselves cannot all be separated. A model was developed to resolve in situ phytoplankton absorption from a measured in situ total absorption spectrum which includes water, dissolved organics, particulate detritus, and phytoplankton. The model was tested on a set of absorption… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
267
4
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 401 publications
(310 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
26
267
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we adopted G 1 and G 2 from Gordon et al [21] to be consistent with previously published work [3][4][5][7][8][9] and variable S bp and a ϕ λ to better represent heterogeneous natural environments than would be possible with fixed values. Our choice of a fixed S dg represents a compromise between multiple published values [8,24], although we expect GIOP-DC to ultimately adopt a variable S dg as methods for its dynamic calculation improve. Note, we did not make these choices based on comparisons with in situ or synthetic data sets, nor do we suggest that these parameterizations represent all natural oceanic conditions at all times.…”
Section: B Model Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, we adopted G 1 and G 2 from Gordon et al [21] to be consistent with previously published work [3][4][5][7][8][9] and variable S bp and a ϕ λ to better represent heterogeneous natural environments than would be possible with fixed values. Our choice of a fixed S dg represents a compromise between multiple published values [8,24], although we expect GIOP-DC to ultimately adopt a variable S dg as methods for its dynamic calculation improve. Note, we did not make these choices based on comparisons with in situ or synthetic data sets, nor do we suggest that these parameterizations represent all natural oceanic conditions at all times.…”
Section: B Model Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where S d and S g typically vary between 0.01 and 0.02 nm −1 in natural waters [24]. As the spectral shapes of NAP and CDOM absorption differ only in their exponential slopes, the two components are typically combined for satellite applications and Eq.…”
Section: A Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to invert reliably the remotely sensed ocean color to obtain the concentration of optically significant material, it is of major importance to determine CDOM distribution and its effect on ocean color. The spectral absorption by CDOM (here denoted by a a) at the visible wavelengths can be described, to a high degree of accuracy, by a single exponential or a sum of two exponentials that decrease with increasing wavelength Jerlov, 1968; Roesler et al, 1989]. As in previous studies, we use the term CDOM to denote colored material that passes through a 0.2 /•m filter, regardless of its origin and chemical composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corrections were made for detrital absorption using the theoretical approach proposed by Hoepffner & Sathyendranath (1993), which assumes an exponential shape for detrital absorption (Roesler et al 1989, Bricaud & Stramski 1990). According to this method, the total absorption by particles can be defined as:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%