2022
DOI: 10.1002/eap.2700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling impacts of drought‐induced salinity intrusion on carbon dynamics in tidal freshwater forested wetlands

Abstract: Tidal freshwater forested wetlands (TFFW) provide critical ecosystem services including an essential habitat for a variety of wildlife species and significant carbon sinks for atmospheric carbon dioxide. However, large uncertainties remain concerning the impacts of climate change on the magnitude and variability of carbon fluxes and storage across a range of TFFW. In this study, we developed a process‐driven Tidal Freshwater Wetlands DeNitrification‐DeComposition model (TFW‐DNDC) that has integrated new featur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(174 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were significant “river by site by scenario” ( p < 0.0001) and “site by scenario” ( p < 0.05) interactions for simulated CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes (Appendix S1: Tables S1 and S2, simulation results are available in Wang, Dai, Krauss, et al, 2022), indicating that drought‐induced saltwater intrusion significantly affected the emissions of CH 4 and N 2 O, and the responses of CH 4 and N 2 O emissions to drought‐induced saltwater intrusion varied significantly by river system (the Savannah and Waccamaw rivers) and by TFFW study site location along rivers (upper, middle, lower, and marsh). One‐way ANOVAs (Appendix S1: Table S3) revealed that the increase in soil salinity and reduction in soil water level due to drought and drought‐induced saltwater intrusion tended to greatly affect CH 4 and N 2 O emissions in TFFW, and the impacts of drought‐induced saltwater intrusion would vary with the river systems and site geomorphologic settings to determine the magnitude and direction of the biogeochemical processes in responses to drought‐induced saltwater intrusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There were significant “river by site by scenario” ( p < 0.0001) and “site by scenario” ( p < 0.05) interactions for simulated CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes (Appendix S1: Tables S1 and S2, simulation results are available in Wang, Dai, Krauss, et al, 2022), indicating that drought‐induced saltwater intrusion significantly affected the emissions of CH 4 and N 2 O, and the responses of CH 4 and N 2 O emissions to drought‐induced saltwater intrusion varied significantly by river system (the Savannah and Waccamaw rivers) and by TFFW study site location along rivers (upper, middle, lower, and marsh). One‐way ANOVAs (Appendix S1: Table S3) revealed that the increase in soil salinity and reduction in soil water level due to drought and drought‐induced saltwater intrusion tended to greatly affect CH 4 and N 2 O emissions in TFFW, and the impacts of drought‐induced saltwater intrusion would vary with the river systems and site geomorphologic settings to determine the magnitude and direction of the biogeochemical processes in responses to drought‐induced saltwater intrusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large increase in N 2 O emission in Savannah marsh sites under the drought condition may also be related to the lower nitrate loading rate at the oligohaline marsh site (18 μmol N m −2 day −1 ) compared to other sites (44–251 μmol N m −2 day −1 ) (Noe et al, 2013). Under the drought condition, SOM decomposition increased significantly (Wang, Dai, Trettin, et al, 2022), leading to increase in available NO 3 ‐N thus an increase in dentification in this N‐limited environment (Korol & Noe, 2020). Available NO 3 ‐N is often used over N 2 O as a terminal electron acceptor by denitrifying microorganisms in N‐limited ecosystems, and complete denitrification to N 2 is less likely (Megonigal & Neubauer, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations