Modeling Hacktivism Using System Dynamics

Drmola, Jakub; Bastl, Martin; Mareš, Miroslav

doi:10.1080/19361610.2015.1004514

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Forrester in 1950 to help managers improve industrial processes that have dynamic behavior (Saavedra et al, 2018). Characteristic of system dynamics is the existence of feedback loops (Drmola et al, 2015) that have an impact on complex system behavior and must be considered when designing policies (Duryan et al, 2012). Loop is a technical term that gives an image of a serpent that is swallowing its tail, a symbol of continuity, or interconnection (Mella, 2008).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Development of Food Security Behavior Model through Environmental-Based Learning: A System Dynamics Approach

Sjaifuddin

Hidayat

Fathurrohman

et al. 2019

JPII

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Food security behavior is essential to be developed through continuous development of knowledge, awareness, attitudes, values, skills, and responsibility. Utilization of system dynamics methodology in educational research in the field of food security is still limited. Thus, this research aimed to develop a model of food security behavior through environmental-based learning by utilizing a system dynamics methodology. This approach starts with defining problems dynamically, developing concepts in circular causality, identifying stocks, flows, simulating, and validating the model. Through quantification of variables involved in the development of food security behavior model, the results showed that during 6 years of simulation, environmental-based learning could improve food security behavior sustainably (from 10.60 at the beginning to 74.19 at the end of simulation year) having the growth forming an exponential curve. The increase of food security behavior occurred gradually through increasing food security attitudes (from 2.09 to 7.45), food security awareness (from 0.55 to 2.34), food security values (from 0.23 to 0.85), food security knowledge (from 1.53 to 6.17), food security skills (from 0.61 to 1.83), and food security responsibility (from 0.88 to 1.67).

show abstract