2020 IEEE CyberPELS (CyberPELS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cyberpels49534.2020.9311540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Communication Networks in a Real-Time Simulation Environment for Evaluating Controls of Shipboard Power Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sources of cyber threats can be generalized as two aspects: random communication failures and malicious attacks. The random communication failures of the microgrids could occur due to the vulnerability of the sophisticated communication scheme, while mission critical applications require accurate and real-time operations [52]. Delayed or unsuccessful communication attempts possibly lead to ineffective or inefficient response to emergency and alarm events, which may further trigger the response of the microgrid protection scheme, and cause severe cascading failures.…”
Section: Threat Analysis Against Cyber Attacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sources of cyber threats can be generalized as two aspects: random communication failures and malicious attacks. The random communication failures of the microgrids could occur due to the vulnerability of the sophisticated communication scheme, while mission critical applications require accurate and real-time operations [52]. Delayed or unsuccessful communication attempts possibly lead to ineffective or inefficient response to emergency and alarm events, which may further trigger the response of the microgrid protection scheme, and cause severe cascading failures.…”
Section: Threat Analysis Against Cyber Attacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation capability in Fig. 23 is based on developments of the controls evaluation framework (CEF) [110]- [112]. For the physical system, the electrical and mechanical components are simulated using hardware and application-specific tools; and support interfacing controls and power devices in hardware-in-theloop (HIL) implementations.…”
Section: Real-time Simulation Of Shipboard Power Systems a Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case study, a distributed power and energy management system is deployed in a 4-zone MVDC ship power system (Fig. 23) [112]. The physical system, i.e., the electrical and mechanical properties of the SPS, are modeled and simulated on a RT Simulator (RTS) while sensor data coming from the devices modeled inside the RTS are sent, through fiber optic and an FPGA, to the communication infrastructure connected to the respective external controllers.…”
Section: B Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both subsystems have support for multiple industrial protocols utilized for the communications between the physical or simulated EPS assets. Advanced control schemes and experimentation with communication network components are also supported via HIL simulations [31], [73]. Additionally, the impact of unexpected failures or cyber-attacks targeted at these components can be examined in a controlled environment where minimum risk exists [32].…”
Section: A Cpes Testbedsmentioning
confidence: 99%