2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling attitudes and perceptions as predictors for changing safety margins during organizational change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Leadership commitment to safety was expanded to include the original intent behind values and allocation of resources , which was changed to leadership behaviours and priorities , a broader heading. The change improved categorisation, yet still emphasised the importance of the influence of allocate resources to safety programmes as a fundamental priority for the leader and for the organisation (Feng et al., ; Lofquist et al., ; Pronovost et al., ; Sammer et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Leadership commitment to safety was expanded to include the original intent behind values and allocation of resources , which was changed to leadership behaviours and priorities , a broader heading. The change improved categorisation, yet still emphasised the importance of the influence of allocate resources to safety programmes as a fundamental priority for the leader and for the organisation (Feng et al., ; Lofquist et al., ; Pronovost et al., ; Sammer et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings reinforce the call to action within the Institute of Medicine report (Kohn, Corrigan, & Donaldson, ) urging health care organisations to strengthen their patient safety culture as a strategy to minimise preventable error. SC is defined as “a surface feature, or manifestation, of an underlying safety culture that provides an understanding of the attitudes and perceptions of a workforce at any given point in time” (Lofquist, Greve, & Olsson, : p. 531). Together, TFL and SC are integral concepts to the safety chain, and a deeper dive into the relationship and factors between them is essential to a full understanding of how leaders minimise preventable error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although active role modeling, teaching, and coaching is perhaps only realistic at the work group level, leaders at the system and organizational level can also use this embedding mechanism by role modeling positive attitudes and actions towards the EBP being implemented. Provider attitudes are an important predictor of EBP implementation effectiveness (2; 41; 47; 96), and leader attitudes influence provider attitudes, particularly during times of change (70; 85; 98). Thus, even though system and organization leaders may not have the opportunities to work directly with teaching and coaching providers, they can serve as important role models in other ways to support the overall development of a positive climate for EBP implementation.…”
Section: Climate Embedding Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring safety is generally considered a very difficult task, at least compared with many other aspects of measuring the results of changes in organizations (Lofquist et al, 2011). In 2002, human error was credited with 15% of unplanned outages (Margeson, 2003 …”
Section: Figure 1 Classification Of Mistakes (After Reason 2004)mentioning
confidence: 99%