2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/9933720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Simulating Online Panic in an Epidemic Complexity System: An Agent‐Based Approach

Abstract: Following the outbreak of a disease, panic often spreads on online forums, which seriously affects normal economic operations as well as epidemic prevention procedures. Online panic is often manifested earlier than in the real world, leading to an aggravated social response from citizens. This paper conducts sentiment analysis on more than 80,000 comments about COVID-19 obtained from the Chinese Internet and identifies patterns within them. Based on this analysis, we propose an agent-based model consisting of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other papers also investigated the effect of some factors, including social media and individual behaviours (Du et al, 2021 ; Palomo‐Briones et al, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ), fear‐driven behaviours (Rajabi et al, 2021 ), human activity patterns (Wang et al, 2021 ), the impact of cross‐reactivity induced by exposure to endemic human coronaviruses (eHCoVs) (Pinotti et al, 2021 ), natural disasters (de Vries & Rambabu, 2021 ) and misinformation diffusion (Prandi & Primiero, 2020 ). In addition, one article simulated transmission of the virus, and online panic and its adverse effects on the control and prevention of COVID‐19 outbreak (Guo, Li, et al, 2021 ). Another one study explored the relationship between the spread of COVID‐19 and economic activities (Kano et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other papers also investigated the effect of some factors, including social media and individual behaviours (Du et al, 2021 ; Palomo‐Briones et al, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ), fear‐driven behaviours (Rajabi et al, 2021 ), human activity patterns (Wang et al, 2021 ), the impact of cross‐reactivity induced by exposure to endemic human coronaviruses (eHCoVs) (Pinotti et al, 2021 ), natural disasters (de Vries & Rambabu, 2021 ) and misinformation diffusion (Prandi & Primiero, 2020 ). In addition, one article simulated transmission of the virus, and online panic and its adverse effects on the control and prevention of COVID‐19 outbreak (Guo, Li, et al, 2021 ). Another one study explored the relationship between the spread of COVID‐19 and economic activities (Kano et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequences of text sentiment analysis may be more objective if there is sufficient data. Traditional methods of sentiment analysis on social media text are either dictionary-and rule-based methods [14,15,16], or shallow models that focus on carefully designed effective features [17], which are tailored to obtain a satisfactory classification of opinion polarities. As for sentiment analysis technology, deep learning methods function better than traditional methods such as the emotional dictionary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%