2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and predicting the mechanical behavior of concrete under uniaxial loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LM was chosen to model interactions happening between the concrete specimen and the two load platens, while FLM was adopted to describe interactions among adjacent rigid particles. The reasonableness of choosing these models to simulate the concrete's uniaxial mechanical behaviors has once been verified in our previously-published studies (Yu et al, 2021aYu et al, 2021b.…”
Section: Principles For Mesoscale Demmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…LM was chosen to model interactions happening between the concrete specimen and the two load platens, while FLM was adopted to describe interactions among adjacent rigid particles. The reasonableness of choosing these models to simulate the concrete's uniaxial mechanical behaviors has once been verified in our previously-published studies (Yu et al, 2021aYu et al, 2021b.…”
Section: Principles For Mesoscale Demmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In this study, since NAC and RAC samples are both modeled as two-dimensional 100×100 mm squares, natural, recycled and compensatory aggregates appearing in these samples are assumed as circular for simplicity. Similar with the practices done in modeling works of (Wang et al, 2019(Wang et al, , 2020Yu et al, 2021a), the sizes and contents of coarse NAs and RAs in NAC and conventional RAC samples are supposed to follow the classical Walraven's formulation:…”
Section: Random Aggregate Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations